Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;41(11):1473-1482.
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000945.

Diffuse Staining for Activated NOTCH1 Correlates With NOTCH1 Mutation Status and Is Associated With Worse Outcome in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Affiliations

Diffuse Staining for Activated NOTCH1 Correlates With NOTCH1 Mutation Status and Is Associated With Worse Outcome in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Dipti P Sajed et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

NOTCH1 is frequently mutated in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). To test the idea that immunohistochemical (IHC) staining can identify ACCs with NOTCH1 mutations, we performed IHC for activated NOTCH1 (NICD1) in 197 cases diagnosed as ACC from 173 patients. NICD1 staining was positive in 194 cases (98%) in 2 major patterns: subset positivity, which correlated with tubular/cribriform histology; and diffuse positivity, which correlated with a solid histology. To determine the relationship between NICD1 staining and NOTCH1 mutational status, targeted exome sequencing data were obtained on 14 diffusely NICD1-positive ACC specimens from 11 patients and 15 subset NICD1-positive ACC specimens from 15 patients. This revealed NOTCH1 gain-of-function mutations in 11 of 14 diffusely NICD1-positive ACC specimens, whereas all subset-positive tumors had wild-type NOTCH1 alleles. Notably, tumors with diffuse NICD1 positivity were associated with significantly worse outcomes (P=0.003). To determine whether NOTCH1 activation is unique among tumors included in the differential diagnosis with ACC, we performed NICD1 IHC on a cohort of diverse salivary gland and head and neck tumors. High fractions of each of these tumor types were positive for NICD1 in a subset of cells, particularly in basaloid squamous cell carcinomas; however, sequencing of basaloid squamous cell carcinomas failed to identify NOTCH1 mutations. These findings indicate that diffuse NICD1 positivity in ACC correlates with solid growth pattern, the presence of NOTCH1 gain-of-function mutations, and unfavorable outcome, and suggest that staining for NICD1 can be helpful in distinguishing ACC with solid growth patterns from other salivary gland and head and neck tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures/Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histologic correlates of NICD1 staining in selected cases diagnosed as ACC. A) NICD1 staining in a tubular/cribriform ACC (hematoxylin counterstain). The field contains several nests of tubular/cribriform ACC showing typical subset NICD1 staining (T) adjacent to normal parotid gland (N), which is NICD1 negative. B) Diffuse NICD1 positivity in a solid ACC. Low-power view demonstrates infiltration of normal salivary gland by an ACC with a solid growth pattern and strong, diffuse NICD1 positivity; note nuclear staining in the high-power inset image. C) Absence of NICD1 staining in a tumor diagnosed as ACC involving the middle turbinate showing a ribbon-like or trabecular to solid growth pattern. Other areas in this tumor showed a tubular/cribriform growth pattern reminiscent of ACC. Note NICD1 staining in endothelial cells, which provide an internal control for immunoreactivity. D) H&E-stained section of a NICD1-negative tumor diagnosed as ACC showing squamoid differentiation and microcystic areas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NOTCH1 mutations in ACC. A) Positions of point substitutions and in-frame indels in the NOTCH1 extracellular negative regulatory region (NRR). NOTCH1 structure is modeled based on X-ray crystallographic studies of Gordon et al. (34). B) Sequence of juxtamembrane insertional mutations caused by small NOTCH1 duplications in biopsies of ACC involving the trachea and liver in the same ACC patient. Residues in red correspond to duplicated amino acid residues; residues in green correspond to unique intervening amino acid residues; and residues in black correspond to normal, unduplicated amino acid residues. Highlighted AV residues in the sequence from the tracheal biopsy corresponds to the normal site of ADAM cleavage in NOTCH1, while highlighted residues in the sequence from the liver biopsy corresponds to the NOTCH1 transmembrane domain (TM). C) Nanostring analysis of RNA isolated from FFPE ACC tissue. RNA was isolated from two specimens containing ACCs with wild type NOTCH1 alleles; four ACC specimens with NOTCH1 alleles with point substitutions or small indels (NOTCH1 mutated); three ACC specimens with loss of copy number spanning NOTCH1 exons 1-27; and the triple negative breast cancer cell line MB-157, which has homozygous or hemizygous NOTCH1 rearrangements and lacks NOTCH1 exons 1–27 (13). RNA abundance expressed as Nanostring signal strength (Y-axis) for each exon covered by probes spanning the NOTCH1 locus (X-axis) was first normalized using average signal strength internal control housekeeping genes and then was expressed relative to signal strength for a NOTCH1-mutated ACC with no evidence of allelic imbalance, for which signal strength for each exon was arbitrarily set at 1. Note that excess signals for NOTCH1 exons 28-34, which encode the NOTCH1 transmembrane domain and intracellular domain, is seen in the control MB-157 triple negative breast cancer cell line (black) and in the 3 samples (red) prepared from specimens with copy number loss involving exons 1-27.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients with NICD1 diffusely positive (n=12) or NICD1 subset positive (n=15) ACC.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Immunohistochemical staining for NICD1 in a representative case of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dillon PM, Chakraborty S, Moskaluk CA, Joshi PJ, Thomas CY. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: A review of recent advances, molecular targets, and clinical trials. Head Neck. 2016;38(4):620–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nascimento AG, Amaral AL, Prado LA, Kligerman J, Silveira TR. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands. A study of 61 cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Cancer. 1986;57(2):312–9. - PubMed
    1. da Cruz Perez DE, de Abreu Alves F, Nobuko Nishimoto I, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP. Prognostic factors in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(2):139–46. - PubMed
    1. Bjorndal K, Krogdahl A, Therkildsen MH, Charabi B, Kristensen CA, Andersen E, et al. Salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma in Denmark 1990–2005: Outcome and independent prognostic factors including the benefit of radiotherapy. Results of the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) Oral Oncol. 2015;51(12):1138–42. - PubMed
    1. van Weert S, van der Waal I, Witte BI, Leemans CR, Bloemena E. Histopathological grading of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: analysis of currently used grading systems and proposal for a simplified grading scheme. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(1):71–6. - PubMed

MeSH terms