Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):127.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9.

Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial

Simone A French  1 , Sarah A Rydell  2 , Nathan R Mitchell  2 , J Michael Oakes  2 , Brian Elbel  3 , Lisa Harnack  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial

Simone A French et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: This research evaluated the effects of financial incentives and purchase restrictions on food purchasing in a food benefit program for low income people.

Methods: Participants (n=279) were randomized to groups: 1) Incentive- 30% financial incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with food benefits; 2) Restriction- no purchase of sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candies with food benefits; 3) Incentive plus Restriction; or 4) Control- no incentive or restrictions. Participants received a study-specific debit card where funds were added monthly for 12-weeks. Food purchase receipts were collected over 16 weeks. Total dollars spent on grocery purchases and by targeted food categories were computed from receipts. Group differences were examined using general linear models.

Results: Weekly purchases of fruit significantly increased in the Incentive plus Restriction ($4.8) compared to the Restriction ($1.7) and Control ($2.1) groups (p <.01). Sugar-sweetened beverage purchases significantly decreased in the Incentive plus Restriction (-$0.8 per week) and Restriction ($-1.4 per week) groups compared to the Control group (+$1.5; p< .0001). Sweet baked goods purchases significantly decreased in the Restriction (-$0.70 per week) compared to the Control group (+$0.82 per week; p < .01).

Conclusions: Paired financial incentives and restrictions on foods and beverages purchased with food program funds may support more healthful food purchases compared to no incentives or restrictions.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02643576 .

Keywords: Financial incentives; Food purchases; Low income; Restrictions; SNAP (supplemental nutrition assistance program).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author information

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The University of Minnesota IRB approved the study. All participants consented to take part in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors consented to the present version of the manuscript submitted here.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts to report.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bhattacharaya J, Currie J, Haider S. Poverty, food insecurity and nutritional outcomes in children and adults. J Health Econ. 2004;23:839–862. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leung CW, Ding EL, Catalano PJ, Villamor E, Rimm EB, Willet WC. Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96:977–988. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.040014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Condon E, Drilea S, Jowers K, Lichtenstein C, Mabil J, Niland K. Diet quality of Americans by SNAP participation status: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010. In: Book Diet quality of Americans by SNAP participation status: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2010. Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc: Mathematica Policy Research for the Food and Nutrition Service; 2015.
    1. Guthrie JF, Lin B-H, Ver Ploeg M, Frazao E. Can food stamps do more to improve food choices? In book can food stamps do more to improve food choices? Economic Research Service: US Department of Agriculture; 2007.
    1. Yen ST. The effects of SNAP and WIC programs on nutrient intakes of children. Food Policy. 2010;35:576–583. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.010. - DOI

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources