Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):789-790.
doi: 10.3945/an.117.016188. Print 2017 Sep.

Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Affiliations
Comment

Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Joerg J Meerpohl et al. Adv Nutr. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: JJM, CEN, PG, REM, and HJS, no conflicts of interest. All authors are members of the GRADE Working Group.

Comment in

  • Reply to JJ Meerpohl et al.
    Schwingshackl L, Knüppel S, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Missbach B, Stelmach-Mardas M, Dietrich S, Eichelmann F, Kontopantelis E, Iqbal K, Aleksandrova K, Lorkowski S, Leitzmann MF, Kroke A, Boeing H. Schwingshackl L, et al. Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):790-791. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016469. Print 2017 Sep. Adv Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28916580 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Comment on

References

    1. Schwingshackl L, Knuppel S, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Missbach B, Stelmach-Mardas M, Dietrich S, Eichelmann F, Kontopanteils E, Iqbal K, et al. . NutriGrade: a scoring system to assess and judge the meta-evidence of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research [perspective]. Adv Nutr 2016;7:994–1004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. West S, King V, Carey TS, Lohr KN, McKoy N, Sutton SF, Lux L. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. In: Evidence report/technology assessment. Vol. 47. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, et al. . GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:383–94. - PubMed
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, et al. . GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:401–6. - PubMed
    1. Kristjansson E, Francis DK, Liberato S, Benkhalti Jandu M, Welch V, Batal M, Greenhalgh T, Rader T, Noonan E, Shea B, et al. . Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD009924. - PMC - PubMed