Reply to JJ Meerpohl et al
- PMID: 28916580
- PMCID: PMC5593114
- DOI: 10.3945/an.117.016469
Reply to JJ Meerpohl et al
Conflict of interest statement
Author disclosures: LS, SK, CS, GH, BM, MS-M, SD, FE, EK, KI, KA, SL, MFL, AK, and HB, no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):994-1004. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013052. Print 2016 Nov. Adv Nutr. 2016. PMID: 28140319 Free PMC article.
-
Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research".Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):789-790. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016188. Print 2017 Sep. Adv Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28916579 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 2012;346 e7492. - PubMed
-
- Schwingshackl L, Knüppel S, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Missbach B, Stelmach-Mardas M, Dietrich S, Eichelmann F, Kontopanteils E, Iqbal K. NutriGrade: a scoring system to assess and judge the meta-evidence of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research [perspective]. Adv Nutr 2016;7:994–1004. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kroke A, Boeing H, Rossnagel K, Willich SN. History of the concept of ‘levels of evidence’ and their current status in relation to primary prevention through lifestyle interventions. Public Health Nutr 2004;7:279–84. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources