Capsular Contracture Rate After Breast Augmentation with Periareolar Versus Other Two (Inframammary and Transaxillary) Incisions: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 28916908
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-0965-1
Capsular Contracture Rate After Breast Augmentation with Periareolar Versus Other Two (Inframammary and Transaxillary) Incisions: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Capsular contracture has been the most common complication of cosmetic breast augmentation. The effect of incision pattern on capsular contracture is still unclear. This meta-analysis demonstrates current evidence with regard to the comparison of capsular contracture rate between periareolar and other two (transaxillary and inframammary) incisions.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 2017. The results of selected studies were meta-analyzed to obtain a pooled odds ratio of the effect of periareolar versus other two incision patterns (transaxillary or inframammary incision) of breast augmentation on capsular contracture rates. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed on periareolar versus transaxillary groups and periareolar versus inframammary groups with regard to capsular contracture rate.
Results: Seven comparative studies were selected and meta-analyzed. Five of the seven studies reported a higher rate of capsular contracture on patients with periareolar incisions. The results showed a significantly higher rate of capsular contracture with periareolar incisions compared with other two incisions (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.15, p = 0.03). Subgroup results showed no significant difference of capsular contracture between periareolar incisions and transaxillary incisions (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52-1.64, p = 0.79) and showed a significantly higher rate of capsular contracture in periareolar incisions compared to inframammary incisions (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.06-3.43, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the contributing effects of periareolar breast augmentation on the rate of capsular contracture. However, more studies with longer tracking periods and higher quality should be conducted to further verify this conclusion.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Breast augmentation; Capsular contracture; Periareolar incision.
Similar articles
-
Correlation between Capsular Contracture Rates and Access Incision Location in Vertical Augmentation Mastopexy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):1029-1033. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009619. Epub 2022 Aug 22. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35994344 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case-Control Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;43(3):563-568. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01324-6. Epub 2019 Mar 25. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30911772
-
Proper Skin Management in Breast Augmentation with a Periareolar Incision Prevents Implant Contamination and Biofilm-Related Capsular Contracture.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1451-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02205-7. Epub 2021 Mar 12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33710353 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116071. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25680100 Free PMC article.
-
Incision and Capsular Contracture Risk: Is There a Relationship in Breast Augmentation and Augmentation/Mastopexy?Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Apr 1;90(4):389-391. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003437. Epub 2023 Feb 15. Ann Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 37093773 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic Primary Breast Augmentation With Loco-Regional Anesthesia: Preliminary Experience of 200 Consecutive Patients.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Apr 30;6:ojae033. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae033. eCollection 2024. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024. PMID: 38938928 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 May 22;3(3):ojab020. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab020. eCollection 2021 Sep. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021. PMID: 34240051 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison Of Endoscopic Transaxillary And Peri-areolar Approaches In Breast Augmentation With Smooth Implants.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2665-2675. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02448-4. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34251473
-
A Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Endoscopic Imaging for Breast Augmentation.Cureus. 2025 Jan 23;17(1):e77889. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77889. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 39991403 Free PMC article.
-
Invited Discussion on: Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Concentration on the Skin After Preoperative Surgical Site Preparation in Breast Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1523-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03023-1. Epub 2022 Aug 5. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35930040 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials