Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;32(3):1441-1448.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5830-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis

Affiliations

Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis

Shengfei Wang et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although endoscopic resection (ER) may be sufficient treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer, additional treatment is recommended when there is a high risk of cancer recurrence. It is unclear whether delaying esophagectomy by performing and assessing the success of ER affects outcomes as compared with immediate esophagectomy without ER. Additionally, long-term survival after sequential ER and esophagectomy required further investigation.

Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, 48 patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy after ER with curative intent at our institution. Two-to-one propensity score methods were used to identify 96 matched-control patients who were treated with esophagectomy only using baseline patient, tumor characteristics and surgical approach. Time from initial evaluation to esophagectomy, relapse-free survival, overall survival, and postoperative complications were compared between the propensity-matched groups.

Results: In the ER + esophagectomy group, the time from initial evaluation to esophagectomy was significantly longer than in the esophagectomy only group (114 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of dense adhesion (p = 0.347), operative time (p = 0.867), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.966), and postoperative length of hospital stay (p = 0.125) were not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were also similar between the two groups (p = 0.411 and p = 0.817, respectively).

Conclusions: Treatment of stage T1 esophageal cancer with ER prior to esophagectomy did not increase the difficulty of performing esophagectomy or the incidence of postoperative complications and did not affect survival after esophagectomy. These results suggest that ER can be recommended for patients with stage T1 cancer even if esophagectomy is warranted eventually.

Keywords: Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal resection; Esophageal neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Propensity score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):96-101 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Aug;72(2):255-64, 264.e1-2 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3805-12 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2007 Jan;39(1):24-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources