Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;89(3):178-181.
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Studies that report unexpected positive blood cultures for Lyme borrelia - are they valid?

Affiliations
Review

Studies that report unexpected positive blood cultures for Lyme borrelia - are they valid?

Gary P Wormser et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Positive blood cultures for Lyme borrelia have been well documented in untreated patients with early Lyme disease. In this report we review the validity of three studies that reported the recovery of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from the blood of a high proportion of patients for whom no evidence was presented, and no claim was made, that the patients had untreated early Lyme disease. In two of the studies the patients had been treated extensively with antibiotics for Lyme disease before the cultures were obtained. Critical evaluation of the three reports suggests that they are invalid. Indeed, two subsequently published studies could not reproduce the results of one of the reports. In a published analysis of another of the reports, investigators from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that the cultures were likely to have been contaminated. When the biologic plausibility of recovering borrelia from blood is extremely low, the level of scientific rigor required of a study that claims a positive result should be particularly high.

Keywords: Blood cultures; Borrelia burgdorferi; Lyme disease; Post-treatment symptoms; Spirochetemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nelson CA, Saha S, Kugeler KJ, Delorey MJ, Shankar MB, Hinckley AF, et al. Incidence of clinician-diagnosed Lyme disease, United States, 2005-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1625–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinckley AF, Connally NP, Meek JI, Johnson BJ, Kemperman MM, Feldman KA, et al. Lyme disease testing by large commercial laboratories in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:678–681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin JJ, Steere AC, Klempner MS, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089–134. - PubMed
    1. Cerar D, Cerar T, Ruzić-Sabljić E, Wormser GP, Strle F. Subjective symptoms after treatment of early Lyme disease. Am J Med. 2010;123:79–86. - PubMed
    1. Feder HM, Jr, Johnson BJB, O'Connell S, Shapiro ED, Steere AC, Wormser GP, et al. A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1422–30. - PubMed

MeSH terms