Condom use and incident sexually transmitted infection after initiation of long-acting reversible contraception
- PMID: 28919400
- PMCID: PMC6262837
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.009
Condom use and incident sexually transmitted infection after initiation of long-acting reversible contraception
Abstract
Background: Use of more effective contraception may lead to less condom use and increased incidence of sexually transmitted infection.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare changes in condom use and incidence of sexually transmitted infection acquisition among new initiators of long-acting reversible contraceptives to those initiating non-long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
Study design: This is a secondary analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. We included 2 sample populations of 12-month continuous contraceptive users. The first included users with complete condom data (baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months) (long-acting reversible contraceptive users: N = 2371; other methods: N = 575). The second included users with 12-month sexually transmitted infection data (long-acting reversible contraceptive users: N = 2102; other methods: N = 592). Self-reported condom use was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months following enrollment. Changes in condom use and incident sexually transmitted infection rates were compared using χ2 tests. Risk factors for sexually transmitted infection acquisition were identified using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Few participants in either group reported consistent condom use across all survey time points and with all partners (long-acting reversible contraceptive users: 5.2%; other methods: 11.3%; P < .001). There was no difference in change of condom use at 3, 6, and 12 months compared to baseline condom use regardless of method type (P = .65). A total of 94 incident sexually transmitted infections were documented, with long-acting reversible contraceptive users accounting for a higher proportion (3.9% vs 2.0%; P = .03). Initiation of a long-acting reversible contraceptive method was associated with increased sexually transmitted infection incidence (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence ratio, 1.07-3.72).
Conclusion: Long-acting reversible contraceptive initiators reported lower rates of consistent condom use, but did not demonstrate a change in condom use when compared to preinitiation behaviors. Long-acting reversible contraceptive users were more likely to acquire a sexually transmitted infection in the 12 months following initiation.
Keywords: long-acting reversible contraception; sexually transmitted infection.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: Jessica Klugman and Qiuhong Zhao report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents.JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):663-670. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1136. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31107513 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):750-760. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.032. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Am J Prev Med. 2021. PMID: 34686301 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Condom Use Among Female US High School Students: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention.JAMA Pediatr. 2016 May 1;170(5):428-34. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0007. JAMA Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 26974492 Free PMC article.
-
Does a choice of condoms impact sexually transmitted infection incidence? A randomized, controlled trial.Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jan;33(1):31-5. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000187200.07639.c6. Sex Transm Dis. 2006. PMID: 16385220 Clinical Trial.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
Cited by
-
Dual method use among long-acting reversible contraceptive users.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018 Apr;23(2):97-104. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1445850. Epub 2018 Mar 27. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018. PMID: 29582687 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Users' Knowledge, Conversations with Healthcare Providers, and Condom Use: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Probability Survey.Int J Sex Health. 2021 Jan 19;33(2):163-174. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2020.1870024. eCollection 2021. Int J Sex Health. 2021. PMID: 38596749 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine Devices and Sexually Transmitted Infection among Older Adolescents and Young Adults in a Cluster Randomized Trial.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Jun;34(3):355-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Dec 1. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33276125 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents.JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):663-670. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1136. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31107513 Free PMC article.
-
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening Among Women Aged 15-24 Years Undergoing a Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Insertion.J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jul;69(1):121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Dec 4. J Adolesc Health. 2021. PMID: 33280976 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012. May 24;366(21):1998–2007. - PubMed
-
- Cates W Jr., Steiner MJ. Dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections: what is the best contraceptive approach? Sex Transm Dis 2002. March;29(3):168–74. - PubMed
-
- Tyler CP, Whiteman MK, Kraft JM, Zapata LB, Hillis SD, Curtis KM, et al. Dual use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among adolescents and young women in the United States. J Adolesc Health 2014. February;54(2):169–75. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical