Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 2:2017:5245-5256.
doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025754.

Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies

Affiliations

Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies

Matthew K Hong et al. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. .

Abstract

Diagnostic radiology reports are increasingly being made available to patients and their family members. However, these reports are not typically comprehensible to lay recipients, impeding effective communication about report findings. In this paper, we present three studies informing the design of a prototype to foster patient-clinician communication about radiology report content. First, analysis of questions posted in online health forums helped us identify patients' information needs. Findings from an elicitation study with seven radiologists provided necessary domain knowledge to guide prototype design. Finally, a clinical field study with 14 pediatric patients, their parents and clinicians, revealed positive responses of each stakeholder when using the prototype to interact with and discuss the patient's current CT or MRI report and allowed us to distill three use cases: co-located communication, preparing for the consultation, and reviewing radiology data. We draw on our findings to discuss design considerations for supporting each of these use cases.

Keywords: Adolescents; Families; H.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation (e.g; HCI): Miscellaneous; Patient–Doctor Communication; Radiology Report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient and parent viewing the patient’s MRI report using a prototype designed to support review and communication with doctors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Excerpts from our field study session showing design of the interactive radiology report prototype. (a) About This Exam; (b) Summary; (c) Full Report. Different types of content extracted from the raw text report are shown on the main screen; information retrieved from the web are displayed on information cards.
Figure 3
Figure 3
My Notes. Each content fragment appears in a (d) note card; user can add a (e) comment, (f) question, or mark a g) favorite note card.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Apache cTAKESTM clinical Text Analysis Knowledge Extraction System. Retrieved January 5, 2017 from http://ctakes.apache.org/
    1. Arnold Corey W, McNamara Mary, El-Saden Suzie, Chen Shawn, Taira Ricky K, Bui Alex AT. Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013;20(6):1028–1036. http://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001457. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basu Pat A, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann Julie A, Spielman Susan B, Van Dalsem Volney F, Rosenberg Jarrett K, Glazer Gary M. Creating a patient-centered imaging service: determining what patients want. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;196(3):605–610. http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berlin Leonard. Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007;189(6):1275–1282. http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2740. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickmore Timothy W, Pfeifer Laura M, Jack Brian W. Taking the time to care: empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09); 2009. pp. 1265–1274. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518891. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources