The reasons of false negative results of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary and mediastinal malignancy

Abstract

Although the sensitivity can reach 99%, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a significantly high false negative rate for diagnosis and staging of thoracic malignancy. We performed this retrospective study to investigate the causes of false negative results and to improve the efficacy and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA. We reviewed all patients suspected of intrapulmonary or mediastinal malignancy who undertook EBUS-TBNA between July 2009 and August 2012 in Chinese PLA general hospital. We retrieved the pathological results of EBUS-TBNA and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and follow-up data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. 185 patients were included in this study. Diagnosis of malignancy was established on 172 patients by EBUS-TBNA, and 8 patients with negative EBUS-TBNA result gained their final diagnosis of malignancy via VATS. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy for EBUS-TBNA were 96%, 100%, 33% and 96% respectively. Inadequacy of the EBUS-TBNA specimens, internal necrosis in the lymph nodes and rare cancer types contributed to the false negative EBUS-TBNA results. VATS is obligatory to explain the negative results of EBUS-TBNA in patients suspected of malignancy.

Keywords: endobronchial ultrasound; lung cancer; negative predictive value.