Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;38(7):1374-1386.
doi: 10.1177/0333102417731348. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Kirstie L Haywood  1   2 , Tom S Mars  2   3 , Rachel Potter  2   3 , Shilpa Patel  2   3 , Manjit Matharu  2   4 , Martin Underwood  2   3
Affiliations

Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Kirstie L Haywood et al. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Aims To critically appraise, compare and synthesise the quality and acceptability of multi-item patient reported outcome measures for adults with chronic or episodic headache. Methods Systematic literature searches of major databases (1980-2016) to identify published evidence of PROM measurement and practical properties. Data on study quality (COSMIN), measurement and practical properties per measure were extracted and assessed against accepted standards to inform an evidence synthesis. Results From 10,903 reviewed abstracts, 103 articles were assessed in full; 46 provided evidence for 23 PROMs: Eleven specific to the health-related impact of migraine (n = 5) or headache (n = 6); six assessed migraine-specific treatment response/satisfaction; six were generic measures. Evidence for measurement validity and score interpretation was strongest for two measures of impact, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ v2.1) and Headache Impact Test 6-item (HIT-6), and one of treatment response, the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R). Evidence of reliability was limited, but acceptable for the HIT-6. Responsiveness was rarely evaluated. Evidence for the remaining measures was limited. Patient involvement was limited and poorly reported. Conclusion While evidence is limited, three measures have acceptable evidence of reliability and validity: HIT-6, MSQ v2.1 and PPMQ-R. Only the HIT-6 has acceptable evidence supporting its completion by all "headache" populations.

Keywords: Headache; patient-reported outcome; reliability; systematic review; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Review of measures used with people with headache – PRISMA flow diagram for article selection (search conducted 1980 to December 2016).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, et al. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41: 646–657. - PubMed
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343–349. - PubMed
    1. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE., Jr Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HITTM). Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 913–933. - PubMed
    1. Castillo J, Munoz P, Guitera V, et al. Epidemiology of chronic daily headache in the general population. Headache 1999; 39: 190–196. - PubMed
    1. Wang S, Fuh J, Lu S, et al. Chronic daily headache in Chinese elderly: Prevalence, risk factors, and biannual follow-up. Neurology 2000; 54: 314–331. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources