Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;53(3):449-460.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1390-6. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Basophils activated via TLR signaling may contribute to pathophysiology of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis

Affiliations

Basophils activated via TLR signaling may contribute to pathophysiology of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis

Masato Yanagawa et al. J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Pathophysiology of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is still unclear. We previously reported that M2 macrophages might play an important role in type 1 AIP. Recently, it has been reported that basophils regulate differentiation to M2 macrophages. In this study, we investigated basophils from the pancreatic tissue and peripheral blood of individuals with type 1 AIP.

Methods: By using immunohistochemistry, we investigated basophils in pancreatic tissue from 13 patients with type 1 AIP and examined expression of toll-like receptors (TLRs) by these cells. Additionally, we obtained peripheral blood samples from 27 healthy subjects, 40 patients with type 1 AIP, 8 patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis, 10 patients with bronchial asthma, and 10 patients with atopic dermatitis, and analyzed activation of basophils by stimulating them with ligands of TLR1-9. We also compared TLR expression in basophils from the tissue and blood samples.

Results: Basophils were detected in pancreatic tissues from 10 of 13 patients with type 1 AIP. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the ratios of basophils activated by TLR4 stimulation in type 1 AIP (9.875 ± 1.148%) and atopic dermatitis (11.768 ± 1.899%) were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects (5.051 ± 0.730%; P < 0.05). Levels of basophils activated by TLR2 stimulation were higher in seven type 1 AIP cases. Furthermore, stimulation of TLR2 and/or TLR4, which were expressed by basophils in pancreas, activated basophils in peripheral blood.

Conclusions: Basophils activated via TLR signaling may play an important role in the pathophysiology of type 1 AIP.

Keywords: Autoimmune pancreatitis; Basophil; M2 macrophage; TLR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification of resting and activated basophils from peripheral blood by flow cytometry. All leukocytes were stained with CD3, CD294, and CD203c. All leukocytes formed discrete FSC/SSC populations after fixation and lysis (a). CD3-positive events (R1) were removed due to the isolation of lymphocytes and monocytes (b). Basophils were defined as CD294 (CRTH2)-positive events (R2) (c). CD203c is a specific marker of activated basophils. Line A was drawn so that 2–5% of basophils were included above it, and we defined them as activated basophils. We compared the percentage of basophils above line A before and after the stimulation (d). These experiments were performed using the Allergenicity Kit (Beckman Coulter Company, Brea, CA, USA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
H&E staining (a, e), immunohistochemical findings for basophils [low magnification view, ×100] (b, f), [high magnification view, ×400] (c, g), and negative controls [high magnification view, ×400] (d, h) in pancreatic tissue samples of two cases with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Infiltration of basophils was confirmed by using mouse anti-basophil antibodies (2D7)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
H&E staining (a), immunohistochemical findings for basophils [low magnification view, ×100] (b), [high magnification view, ×400] (c), and negative controls [high magnification view, ×400] (d) in a pancreatic tissue sample with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the total number of basophils in three different 1-mm2 fields of view in pancreatic tissue samples from patients with type 1 AIP or alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP). The average number of basophils in samples from patients with type 1 AIP was 8.615 ± 2.528 (n = 13). However, basophils were not detected in the pancreatic tissue of patients with ACP (n = 10)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Double-immunofluorescence staining for basophils, TLR2, and TLR4 in pancreatic tissue of patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. Images show staining for basophils (2D7; red, a, e), TLR2 (green, b), TLR4 (green, f), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue, c, g). Merged image of basophils and TLR2 (d)/TLR4 (h)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The ratio of basophils activated by the stimulation of TLR1–TLR9. We analyzed peripheral basophils in healthy subjects (n = 27), patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP, n = 40), patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP, n = 8), patients with bronchial asthma (n = 10), and patients with atopic dermatitis (n = 10). Basophils were stimulated with the TLR1–9 ligands, Pam3CSK4 (400 ng/mL, InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), HKLM (108 cells/mL, InvivoGen), poly:IC (50 μg/mL, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), LPS (1 μg/mL, Sigma), FLA-ST (10 μg/mL, InvivoGen), FSL-1 (5 μg/mL, InvivoGen), imiquimod (5 μg/mL, InvivoGen), ssRNA40/LyoVec (5 μg/mL, InvivoGen), or ODN2006 (10 μg/mL, AdipoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical comparisons of quantitative data were carried out by the Tukey–Kramer test. Differences were considered to be significant when the value of P was less than 0.05 (P < 0.05)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okazaki K, Uchida K, Miyoshi H, et al. Recent concepts of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;41(2):126–138. doi: 10.1007/s12016-010-8214-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchida K, Okazaki K, Konishi Y, et al. Clinical analysis of autoimmune-related pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2788–2794. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03187.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchida K, Miyoshi H, Ikeura T, et al. Clinical and pathophysiological issues associated with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2016;9(1):7–12. doi: 10.1007/s12328-016-0628-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarles H, Sarles JC, Muratore R, et al. Chronic inflammatory sclerosis of the pancreas—an autonomous pancreatic disease? Am J Dig Dis. 1961;6:688–698. doi: 10.1007/BF02232341. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawaguchi K, Koike M, Tsuruta K, et al. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis with cholangitis: a variant of primary sclerosing cholangitis extensively involving pancreas. Hum Pathol. 1991;22(4):387–395. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90087-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources