Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;35(12):697-706.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0681-4. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

The spectrum of imaging appearances of müllerian duct anomalies: focus on MR imaging

Affiliations
Review

The spectrum of imaging appearances of müllerian duct anomalies: focus on MR imaging

Takeru Fukunaga et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are the result of incomplete development, vertical or lateral fusion, or absorption of the müllerian ducts. The range of anomalies includes uterovaginal agenesis or hypoplasia, unicornuate uterus, uterus didelphys, bicornuate uterus, septate uterus, and arcuate uterus. Correct diagnosis and classification of these anomalies are essential because pregnancy outcomes and treatment options vary between the types of anomaly. Furthermore, early identification of MDAs helps to avoid prolonged symptomatic periods and the complications that may subsequently arise, such as infertility, endometriosis, and neoplasm. Although many of these abnormalities are initially diagnosed by ultrasound or hysterosalpingography, MR imaging is the most accurate noninvasive modality available for classification of the various anomalies because of its better anatomic assessment compared with other diagnostic modalities. Familiarity with the wide variety of MDA presentations can help in the planning of appropriate treatment.

Keywords: Classification; Magnetic resonance imaging; Müllerian duct anomalies; Pelvis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMC Med Imaging. 2012 Mar 09;12:4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med Genet. 2000 Sep 4;94(1):9-12 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):e5-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 2009 Dec;82(984):1034-42 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):E233-50 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources