Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;79(5):2745-2751.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26918. Epub 2017 Sep 17.

Validation of highly accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing in patients at 1.5T and 3T

Affiliations

Validation of highly accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing in patients at 1.5T and 3T

Hassan Haji-Valizadeh et al. Magn Reson Med. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To validate an optimal 12-fold accelerated real-time cine MRI pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing (CS) in patients at 1.5T and 3T.

Methods: We used two strategies to reduce image artifacts arising from gradient delays and eddy currents in radial k-space sampling with balanced steady-state free precession readout. We validated this pulse sequence against a standard breath-hold cine sequence in two patient cohorts: a myocardial infarction (n = 16) group at 1.5T and chronic kidney disease group (n = 18) at 3T. Two readers independently performed visual analysis of 68 cine sets in four categories (myocardial definition, temporal fidelity, artifact, noise) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = poor, 3 = adequate or moderate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). Another reader calculated left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including ejection fraction.

Results: Compared with standard cine, real-time cine produced nonsignificantly different visually assessed scores, except for the following categories: 1) temporal fidelity scores were significantly lower (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, 2) artifacts scores were significantly higher (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, and 3) noise scores were significantly (P = 0.013) higher for real-time cine at 1.5T. Standard and real-time cine pulse sequences produced LV functional parameters that were in good agreement (e.g., absolute mean difference in ejection fraction <4%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that an optimal 12-fold, accelerated, real-time cine MRI pulse sequence using radial k-space sampling and CS produces good to excellent visual scores and relatively accurate LV functional parameters in patients at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 79:2745-2751, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Keywords: Cartesian k-space; cardiac function; compressed sensing; radial k-space; real-time cine MRI; tiny golden angles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Pulse sequence diagram showing our sampling strategy. The first heartbeat was used to play pre-scan, dummy scans (green arrows) to approach steady state of magnetization. This is standard for all cine MRI with b-SSFP. Real-time, radial data were acquired in the subsequent 1.75 heartbeats using the TGA sequence (black arrows). Immediately after current data scan and before start of pre-scan, dummy scans for the following imaging plane, 48 rays of calibration data (red arrows; a pair of rays with opposite polarities per direction; 7.5° angular steps) were acquired in lieu of post-scan dummy scans (green arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative multi-slice cine images of a patient with MI acquired at 1.5T. Real-time cine with radial CS produced results that approximate those produced by standard cine MRI. For the corresponding movie files, see Supporting Information (Video S1.avi for standard cine, Video S2.avi for real-time with radial CS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative multi-slice cine images of a patient with CKD acquired at 3T. Real-time cine with radial CS produced results that approximate those produced by standard cine MRI. For the corresponding movie files, see Supporting Information (Video S3.avi for standard cine, Video S4.avi for real-time with radial CS).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Bland-Altman plots showing agreement in LVEF between standard cine (reference) and real-time cine MRI pulse sequences: standard vs. real-time with radial CS at 1.5T (1st column), and standard vs. real-time with radial CS at 3T (second column). The mean difference in LVEF was −3.0 and −1.6% for 1.5T and 3T, respectively, which correspond to −5.3 and −2.6% error relative to mean LVEF values 57.9 and 63.2 % at 1.5T and 3T, respectively.

References

    1. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology. 2001;219(3):828–34. - PubMed
    1. Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Ho VB, Jerosch-Herold M, Kramer CM, Manning WJ, Patel M, Pohost GM, Stillman AE, White RD, Woodard PK. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(23):2614–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkhausen J, Goyen M, Ruhm SG, Eggebrecht H, Debatin JF, Ladd ME. Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(3):731–5. - PubMed
    1. Kellman P, Chefd’hotel C, Lorenz CH, Mancini C, Arai AE, McVeigh ER. Fully automatic, retrospective enhancement of real-time acquired cardiac cine MR images using image-based navigators and respiratory motion-corrected averaging. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(4):771–8. - PubMed
    1. Kellman P, Chefd’hotel C, Lorenz CH, Mancini C, Arai AE, McVeigh ER. High spatial and temporal resolution cardiac cine MRI from retrospective reconstruction of data acquired in real time using motion correction and resorting. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(6):1557–64. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources