Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy
- PMID: 28924601
- PMCID: PMC5597934
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116384
Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy
Abstract
Background and study aims: The relevance of incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG PET/CT uptake is debatable. All patients who were referred for colonoscopy because of incidental colonic focal FDG uptake were included in this retrospective study.
Patients and methods: PET/CT imaging characteristics were reviewed by a nuclear physician who was blinded to endoscopic and histopathological findings to determine the location of FDG uptake sites and to measure the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Endoscopic findings were categorized as malignant lesions (ML), high-risk polyps (HRP), low-risk polyps (LRP) or other non-neoplastic lesions (NNL).
Results: Seventy patients with 84 foci of FDG uptake were included. The proportions of true-positive (lesions found at colonoscopy at the same location) and false-positive (no lesion at colonoscopy) PET/CT findings were 65.5 % (n = 55) and 34.5 % (n = 29). Median SUVmax values did not differ between true-positive and false-positive findings ( P = 0.27). Median MV30 values differed significantly between true-positive (5.5 cm 3 , [3.3 - 10.9 cm 3 ]) and false-positive (9.7 cm 3 , [5.2 - 40.8 cm 3 ]) findings ( P = 0.015). Among the 55 true-positive FDG uptake sites, there were 14 (25.5 %) malignant lesions, 30 (54.5 %) HRP, 4 (7.3 %) LRP, and 7 (12.7 %) NNL. Median MV30 values differed significantly between advanced neoplasia (5.0 cm 3 , [2.9 - 9.7 cm 3 ]) and other endoscopic findings (9.4 cm 3 , [5.2 - 39.8 cm 3 ]) ( P = 0.001); the AUROC was 0.71. By per-colonic segment analysis, the distribution of true-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative FDG PET/CT findings was as follows: 21.5 %, 14.2 %, 11.5 %, and 52.8 %, respectively.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that follow-up complete colonoscopy is mandatory in all patients with incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG PET/CT uptake.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Colonoscopic Findings in Patients With Incidental Colonic Focal FDG Uptake.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):W586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12817. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25905966
-
Accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for Detection of Incidental Pre-Malignant and Malignant Colonic Lesions - Correlation with Colonoscopic and Histopathologic Findings.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):4143-7. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016. PMID: 27644675
-
Incidental colonic focal FDG uptake on PET/CT: can the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) guide us in the timing of colonoscopy?Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan;42(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2887-3. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25139518
-
Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature.Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):174-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02588.x. Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 21689289 Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):456-463. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1747-1. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30132094
Cited by
-
Incidental anal 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should we further examine the patient?World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 6;8(17):3679-3690. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3679. World J Clin Cases. 2020. PMID: 32953844 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of water enema PET/CT: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01186-0. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38172764 Free PMC article.
-
Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?World J Clin Cases. 2024 May 26;12(15):2466-2474. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2466. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38817235 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of patients via colonoscopy who underwent positron emission tomography/computerized tomography due to colon involvement.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Sep 25;69(10):e20230409. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230409. eCollection 2023. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023. PMID: 37792869 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging.Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2022 Jun 27;31(2):96-103. doi: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.38247. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2022. PMID: 35770960 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agress H, Cooper B Z. Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2004;230:417–422. - PubMed
-
- Even-Sapir E, Lerman H, Gutman M et al.The presentation of malignant tumours and pre-malignant lesions incidentally found on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:541–552. - PubMed
-
- Ozkol V, Alper E, Aydin N et al.The clinical value of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid foci detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:128–136. - PubMed
-
- Ishimori T, Patel P V, Wahl R L. Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:752–757. - PubMed
-
- Beatty J S, Williams H T, Aldridge B A et al.Incidental PET/CT findings in the cancer patient: how should they be managed? Surgery. 2009;146:274–281. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous