Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;62(1):1700278.
doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700278. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps

Affiliations
Review

Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps

Gabriel Mazzucchelli et al. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Food allergies are recognized as a global health concern. In order to protect allergic consumers from severe symptoms, allergenic risk assessment for well-known foods and foods containing genetically modified ingredients is installed. However, population is steadily growing and there is a rising need to provide adequate protein-based foods, including novel sources, not yet used for human consumption. In this context safety issues such as a potential increased allergenic risk need to be assessed before marketing novel food sources. Therefore, the established allergenic risk assessment for genetically modified organisms needs to be re-evaluated for its applicability for risk assessment of novel food proteins. Two different scenarios of allergic sensitization have to be assessed. The first scenario is the presence of already known allergenic structures in novel foods. For this, a comparative assessment can be performed and the range of cross-reactivity can be explored, while in the second scenario allergic reactions are observed toward so far novel allergenic structures and no reference material is available. This review summarizes the current analytical methods for allergenic risk assessment, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method and discussing the gaps in this assessment that need to be addressed in the near future.

Keywords: allergenic risk assessment; analytical methods; cross-reactivity; food allergy; novel food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart on current risk assessment approach for GMO risk assessment adopted for novel foods from EFSA.2, 4, 25 Allergenic risk assessment of novel foods focusing on allergenic cross reactive structures.

References

    1. Nwaru B. I., Hickstein L., Panesar S. S., Roberts G., Muraro A., Sheikh A., Allergy 2014, 69, 992. - PubMed
    1. EFSA , EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2150.
    1. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products , EFSA J. 2016. 14, 4594.
    1. Verhoeckx K., Broekman H., Knulst A., Houben G., Regul Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 79, 118. - PubMed
    1. Bogh K. L., van Bilsen J., Glogowski R., Lopez‐Exposito I., Bouchaud G., Blanchard C., Bodinier M., Smit J., Pieters R., Bastiaan‐Net S., de Wit N., Untersmayr E., Adel‐Patient K., Knippels L., Epstein M. M., Noti M., Nygaard U. C., Kimber I., Verhoeckx K., O'Mahony L., Clin. Transl Allergy 2016, 6, 21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types