Variability in Usual Care Mechanical Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Time for a Decision Support Protocol?
- PMID: 28930815
- PMCID: PMC5679099
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001319
Variability in Usual Care Mechanical Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Time for a Decision Support Protocol?
Abstract
Objectives: Although pediatric intensivists philosophically embrace lung protective ventilation for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, we hypothesized that ventilator management varies. We assessed ventilator management by evaluating changes to ventilator settings in response to blood gases, pulse oximetry, or end-tidal CO2. We also assessed the potential impact that a pediatric mechanical ventilation protocol adapted from National Heart Lung and Blood Institute acute respiratory distress syndrome network protocols could have on reducing variability by comparing actual changes in ventilator settings to those recommended by the protocol.
Design: Prospective observational study.
Setting: Eight tertiary care U.S. PICUs, October 2011 to April 2012.
Patients: One hundred twenty patients (age range 17 d to 18 yr) with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Measurements and main results: Two thousand hundred arterial and capillary blood gases, 3,964 oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, and 2,757 end-tidal CO2 values were associated with 3,983 ventilator settings. Ventilation mode at study onset was pressure control 60%, volume control 19%, pressure-regulated volume control 18%, and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation 3%. Clinicians changed FIO2 by ±5 or ±10% increments every 8 hours. Positive end-expiratory pressure was limited at ~10 cm H2O as oxygenation worsened, lower than would have been recommended by the protocol. In the first 72 hours of mechanical ventilation, maximum tidal volume/kg using predicted versus actual body weight was 10.3 (8.5-12.9) (median [interquartile range]) versus 9.2 mL/kg (7.6-12.0) (p < 0.001). Intensivists made changes similar to protocol recommendations 29% of the time, opposite to the protocol's recommendation 12% of the time and no changes 56% of the time.
Conclusions: Ventilator management varies substantially in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Opportunities exist to minimize variability and potentially injurious ventilator settings by using a pediatric mechanical ventilation protocol offering adequately explicit instructions for given clinical situations. An accepted protocol could also reduce confounding by mechanical ventilation management in a clinical trial.
Figures

Actual CPCCRN data (Light blue boxes); Mean value (◇), Median (Bar), IQR (Box), Range (Whiskers), Outliers (○), Protocol Targets (Dark blue bars).
Missing values are for 15 of the 3504 PEEP/FiO2 observations for which no FiO2 was recorded. In addition, there were 26 observations excluded where no PEEP was recorded.

Tidal volumes were maintained in the 7–8 ml/kg range for this group of patients with severe pediatric ARDS over the first three days. The resolution of disease over the week is implied by decreasing peak pressures and rising pHs with tidal volumes having increased up to approximately 11 ml/kg ABW.
Mean value (◇), Median (Bar), IQR (Box), Range (Whiskers), Outliers (○).
Comment in
-
The Quest for the Holy Grail of Optimizing Mechanical Ventilation and Protecting the Lung in Mechanically Ventilated Infants and Children.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):1075-1076. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001324. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 29099451 No abstract available.
References
-
- Santschi M, Jouvet P, Leclerc F, et al. Acute lung injury in children: Therapeutic practice and feasibility of international clinical trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(6):681–9. - PubMed
-
- ARDSNet. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8. - PubMed
-
- Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J, et al. Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(8):566–76. - PubMed
-
- Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Perez-Mendez L, et al. A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1311–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U10 HD063108/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- R21 HD061870/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD050012/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD049983/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD050096/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD049981/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD050096/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD049983/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD063106/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD063108/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- RL1 HD107773/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD063114/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U01 HD049934/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD049981/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous