Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;96(38):e7943.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007943.

18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging of vulvar cancer patients: is it really effective?

Affiliations

18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging of vulvar cancer patients: is it really effective?

Cinzia Crivellaro et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging of vulvar cancer patients.29 pts (69 years, range 51-88) with vulvar cancer (clinical apparent stage I-II), underwent preoperative FDG-PET/CT scan followed by radical vulvectomy and bilateral (or monolateral in case of tumor >2 cm from midline) inguinal lymphadenectomy ± sentinel node biopsy. PET/CT images were analyzed in consensus and correlated to histological findings according to a pt-based and a groin-based analyses. SUVmax of the nodal uptake of each inguinal area (if present) was calculated and correlated to histological findings. The presence of distant metastases was also considered and confirmed.PET/CT analysis in consensus resulted negative at the inguinal LN level in 17 pts (10 true negative, 7 false negative) and positive in 12 pts (7 true positive, 5 false positive). Incidence of LN metastases resulted 48%. On pt-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive value of PET/CT in detecting LN metastases were 50%, 67%, 59%, 59%, and 58%, respectively. On a groin-based analysis, considering overall 50 LN-sites, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive value of PET/CT were 53%, 85%, 73%, 67%, and 76%, respectively. The mean value of SUVmax was 6.1 (range 0.7-16.2) for metastatic nodes, whereas 1.6 (range 0.7 - 5.4) for negative lymph-nodes (P = .007). PET/CT detected pelvic (n = 1) and both pelvic/paraortic (n = 1) nodal metastases.In clinical early stage vulvar cancer FDG PET/CT showed low sensitivity and moderate specificity for N-staging; therefore, it is not an accurate tool for the nodal status assessment. PET/CT may not be cost-effective in detecting the rare event of distant metastases, but further studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
From the left, axial CT, fused PET/CT, and PET images of a false negative case. PET showed no FDG groin uptake bilaterally, whereas a partial metastasis was found at histology in a left inguino-femoral LN. CT = computed tomography, FDG = fluoro-deoxy-glucose, PET/CT = positron emission tomographic/computed tomographic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
From the left, axial CT, fused PET/CT, and PET images of a false positive case. PET showed a pathological FDG uptake at the right inguinal site (SUVmax 3.53), whereas no metastases were found at histology. CT = computed tomography, FDG = fluoro-deoxy-glucose, PET/CT = positron emission tomographic/computed tomographic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Vulvar cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:92–120. - PubMed
    1. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Vulval Carcinoma. 2014. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/vulvalcancergu....
    1. Hacker NF, Eifel PJ, van der Velden J. Cancer of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131(suppl 2):S76–83. - PubMed
    1. Zweizig S, Korets S, Cain JM. Key concepts in management of vulvar cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014;28:959–66. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances