Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
- PMID: 28932267
- PMCID: PMC5598812
- DOI: 10.1177/1756283X17722916
Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based algorithms can be used to guide infliximab (IFX) adjustments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to explore a rapid IFX-quantification test from a clinical perspective.
Methods: This manuscript describes a prospective cohort study involving 110 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients on the maintenance phase of IFX. IFX trough levels were quantified using a rapid quantification assay and a commonly-used reference kit.
Results: Irrespective of the assay used to measure IFX, its through levels were statistically different between patients with and without endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score = 0), as well as between patients stratified by their faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Despite the fact that the two methods correlated well with each other [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.843, p < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.791-0.903], there was a discernible systematic variation; values obtained with the reference kit were on average 2.62 units higher than those obtained with the rapid assay. Notwithstanding, 3 µg/ml was shown to be an acceptable cut-off to assess endoscopic status and inflammatory burden levels using both assays. The percentage of patients that had a positive outcome when the IFX concentration measured by the rapid assay ranked above 3 µg/ml was 88% both for a Mayo endoscopic score ⩽ 1 and for an FC concentration <250 µg/g.
Conclusions: Based on this study, we concluded that using the rapid IFX assessment system with a 3 µg/ml threshold is a reliable alternative to the time-consuming enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in patients on the maintenance phase of IFX.
Keywords: infliximab; therapeutic window; ulcerative colitis.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: FM served as speaker and received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme (NJ, USA), Abbvie (IL, USA), Vifor (Glattbrugg, Switzerland), Falk (USA), Laboratorios Vitoria (Amadora, Portugal), Ferring (Saint-Prex, Switzerland), Hospira (IL, USA) and Biogen (MA, USA).
Figures
References
-
- O’Toole A, Moss AC. Optimizing biologic agents in ulcerative colitis and crohn’s disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2015; 17: 32. - PubMed
-
- Mould DR, Dubinsky MC. Dashboard systems: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mediated dose optimization for monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 55: S51–S59. - PubMed
-
- Adedokun OJ, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Association between serum concentration of infliximab and efficacy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 1296–1307, e5. - PubMed
-
- Strik AS, Bots SJA, D’Haens G, et al. Optimization of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2016; 9: 429–439. - PubMed
-
- Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, et al. Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1248–1254. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
