Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results
- PMID: 28932961
- PMCID: PMC7539290
- DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2
Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results
Abstract
Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.
Keywords: Expectations; Genetic counseling; Genomics research; Influence of provider; Motivations; Return of results.
Conflict of interest statement
Courtney Berrios, Cynthia James, Karen Raraigh, Juli Bollinger, Brittney Murray, Crystal Tichnell and Amanda Bergner declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0445-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 31924199 Free PMC article.
-
Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Nov;164A(11):2745-52. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36706. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Am J Med Genet A. 2014. PMID: 25251809 Free PMC article.
-
Motivation to participate and experiences of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric care in Uganda.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 28;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00672-w. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 34320963 Free PMC article.
-
"I didn't have anything to decide, I wanted to help my kids"-An interview-based study of consent procedures for sampling human biological material for genetic research in rural Pakistan.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):113-127. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1472148. Epub 2018 Jun 28. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 29722609 Review.
-
Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Aug 3;10(8):a036582. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036582. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020. PMID: 31570382 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Awareness, experiences and perceptions regarding genetic testing and the return of genetic and genomics results in a hypothetical research context among patients in Uganda: a qualitative study.J Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;50(12):829-834. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108885. J Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 38290855 Free PMC article.
-
Research participants' perception of ethical issues in stroke genomics and neurobiobanking research in Africa.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Oct 3:2023.10.03.23296473. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.03.23296473. medRxiv. 2023. Update in: PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0292906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292906. PMID: 37873327 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Effectiveness of Telehealth Versus In-Person Informed Consent: Randomized Study of Comprehension and Decision-Making.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e63473. doi: 10.2196/63473. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40053795 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.J Perinatol. 2021 Dec;41(12):2826-2833. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01220-5. Epub 2021 Oct 18. J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 34663901 Free PMC article.
-
Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):12-23. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823906. Epub 2020 Oct 5. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021. PMID: 33017265 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling. (2013). Practice-based competencies for genetic counselors. - PubMed
-
- Bernhardt BA, Tambor ES, Fraser G, Wissow LS, & Geller G (2003). Parents’ and children’s attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: Implications for informed consent. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 116A(4), 315–323. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical