Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun 11;5(2):15.
doi: 10.3390/diseases5020015.

Biomarkers and Imaging Findings of Anderson-Fabry Disease-What We Know Now

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers and Imaging Findings of Anderson-Fabry Disease-What We Know Now

Idalina Beirão et al. Diseases. .

Abstract

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, caused by deficiency or absence of the alpha-galactosidase A activity, with a consequent glycosphingolipid accumulation. Biomarkers and imaging findings may be useful for diagnosis, identification of an organ involvement, therapy monitoring and prognosis. The aim of this article is to review the current available literature on biomarkers and imaging findings of AFD patients. An extensive bibliographic review from PubMed, Medline and Clinical Key databases was performed by a group of experts from nephrology, neurology, genetics, cardiology and internal medicine, aiming for consensus. Lyso-GB3 is a valuable biomarker to establish the diagnosis. Proteinuria and creatinine are the most valuable to detect renal damage. Troponin I and high-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponin T can identify patients with cardiac lesions, but new techniques of cardiac imaging are essential to detect incipient damage. Specific cerebrovascular imaging findings are present in AFD patients. Techniques as metabolomics and proteomics have been developed in order to find an AFD fingerprint. Lyso-GB3 is important for evaluating the pathogenic mutations and monitoring the response to treatment. Many biomarkers can detect renal, cardiac and cerebrovascular involvement, but none of these have proved to be important to monitoring the response to treatment. Imaging features are preferred in order to find cardiac and cerebrovascular compromise in AFD patients.

Keywords: Anderson–Fabry disease; Lyso-Gb3; biomarkers; cardiac involvement; cerebrovascular involvement; diagnosis; imaging; metabolomics; proteomics; renal involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Germain D.P. Fabry disease. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2010 doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gal A., Hughes D.A., Winchester B. Toward a consensus in the laboratory diagnostics of Fabry disease—Recommendations of a European expert group. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2011;34:509–514. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9261-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Linthorst G.E., Vedder A.C., Aerts J.M., Hollak C.E. Screening for Fabry disease using whole blood spots fails to identify one-third of female carriers. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2005;353:201–203. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001;69:89–95. - PubMed
    1. Cox T.M. Biomarkers in lysosomal storage diseases. In: Mehta A., Beck M., Sunder-Plassmann G., editors. Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS. Oxford PharmaGenesis; Oxford, England: 2006. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources