Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 2;13(11):2688-2694.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1365995. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Nasal aluminum (oxy)hydroxide enables adsorbed antigens to induce specific systemic and mucosal immune responses

Affiliations

Nasal aluminum (oxy)hydroxide enables adsorbed antigens to induce specific systemic and mucosal immune responses

Haiyue Xu et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Some insoluble aluminum salts are commonly used in injectable vaccines as adjuvants to accelerate, prolong, or enhance the antigen-specific immune responses. Data from previous studies testing the nasal mucosal vaccine adjuvant activity of aluminum salts are conflicting. The present study is designed to further assess the feasibility of using aluminum salts in injectable vaccines as nasal mucosal vaccine adjuvants. Using Alhydrogel®, the international scientific standard of aluminum (oxy)hydroxide gels, and ovalbumin or 3 × M2e-HA2, a synthetic influenza virus fusion protein, as antigens, we showed in a mouse model that when dosed intranasally Alhydrogel® enables antigens adsorbed on it to induce stronger antigen-specific immune responses in both serum samples (e.g., specific IgG) and nasal and lung mucosal secretions (i.e., specific IgA) in all immunized mice, as compared with nasal immunization with the antigens alone. Rerouting insoluble aluminum salts in injectable vaccines may represent a viable approach for (nasal) mucosal vaccine adjuvant discovery.

Keywords: MPLA; Mucosal vaccine adjuvant; aluminum salts; antibody responses; cytokine release.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
OVA-specific IgA levels in the nasal wash (A) and BAL samples (B) of mice intranasally immunized with OVA-adsorbed Alhydrogel®. Mice (n = 5) were dosed on days 0, 14, and 28 with OVA/Alhydrogel®, OVA/MPLA, OVA alone, or sterile PBS. The dose of OVA was 5 μg per mouse, 5 μg for MPLA, and 20 μg for Alhydrogel®. The anti-OVA IgA levels (OD450 values) in nose wash and BAL samples were measured 14 d after the third immunization (*p < 0.05, vs. OVA; #p < 0.05, OVA/Alhydrogel® vs. OVA/MPLA).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
OVA-specific IgG1 (A) and IgG2a (B) levels in the sera of mice intranasally immunized with OVA-adsorbed Alhydrogel®. Mice (n = 5) were dosed on days 0, 14 and 28 with OVA/Alhydrogel®, OVA/MPLA, OVA alone, or sterile PBS. The dose of OVA was 5 μg per mouse, 5 μg for MPLA and 20 μg for Alhydrogel®. The anti-OVA IgG1 and IgG2a levels (OD450 values) in serum samples were measured 14 d after the third immunization (*p < 0.05, vs. OVA; #p < 0.05, OVA/Alhydrogel® vs. OVA/MPLA).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
In vitro release of IL-4 and IFN-γ by splenocytes isolated from mice intranasally immunized with OVA-adsorbed Alhydrogel®. Mice (n = 5) were dosed on days 0, 14, and 28 with OVA/Alhydrogel®, OVA/MPLA, OVA alone, or sterile PBS. On day 42, splenocytes (2 × 106 cells/mL) isolated from individual mouse were stimulated with OVA (10 μg/mL) for 48 h. IL-4 and IFN-γ concentrations in cell culture medium were determined using ELISA kits (*p < 0.05, vs. OVA; #p < 0.05, OVA/MPLA vs. OVA/Alhydrogel®).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Antigen (3 × M2e-HA2)-specific total IgG levels in the serum (A), and IgA levels in the nasal wash (B) and BAL (C) samples of mice intranasally immunized with 3 × M2e-HA2-adsorbed Alhydrogel®. Mice (n = 5) were dosed on days 0, 14 and 28 with 3 × M2e-HA2/Alhydrogel®, 3 × M2e-HA2/MPLA, 3 × M2e-HA2 alone or sterile PBS. The dose of 3 × M2e-HA2 was 5 μg per mouse, 5 μg for MPLA, and 50 μg for Alhydrogel®. The anti-3 × M2e-HA2 IgG (OD450 values) in the serum samples and IgA levels in the nose wash and BAL samples were measured 14 d after the third immunization (*p < 0.05, vs. 3 × M2e-HA2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mbow ML, De Gregorio E, Valiante NM, Rappuoli R. New adjuvants for human vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:411-6. PMID:20466528 - PubMed
    1. Bomford R. The comparative selectivity of adjuvants for humoral and cell-mediated immunity. I. Effect on the antibody response to bovine serum albumin and sheep red blood cells of Freund's incomplete and complete adjuvants, alhydrogel, Corynebacterium parvum, Bordetella pertussis, muramyl dipeptide and saponin. Clin Exp Immunol. 1980;39:426-34. PMID:6248282 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris JR, Soliakov A, Lewis RJ, Depoix F, Watkinson A, Lakey JH. Alhydrogel(R) adjuvant, ultrasonic dispersion and protein binding: a TEM and analytical study. Micron. 2012;43:192-200. PMID:21831642 - PubMed
    1. Butler WT, Rossen RD, Wenden RD. Effect of physical state and route of inoculation of diphtheria toxoid on the formation of nasal secretory and serum antibodies in man. J Immunol. 1970;104:1396-400. PMID:5463220 - PubMed
    1. Isaka M, Yasuda Y, Kozuka S, Miura Y, Taniguchi T, Matano K, Goto N, Tochikubo K. Systemic and mucosal immune responses of mice to aluminium-adsorbed or aluminium-non-adsorbed tetanus toxoid administered intranasally with recombinant cholera toxin B subunit. Vaccine. 1998;16:1620-6. PMID:9713937 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources