Sequential whole report accesses different states in visual working memory
- PMID: 28933904
- DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000466
Sequential whole report accesses different states in visual working memory
Abstract
Working memory (WM) enables a rapid access to a limited number of items that are no longer physically present. WM studies usually involve the encoding and retention of multiple items, while probing a single item only. Hence, little is known about how well multiple items can be reported from WM. Here we asked participants to successively report each of up to 8 encoded Gabor patches from WM. Recall order was externally cued, and stimulus orientations had to be reproduced on a continuous dimension. Participants were able to sequentially report items from WM with an above-chance precision even at high set sizes. It is important that we observed that precision varied systematically with report order: It dropped steeply from the first to the second report but decreased only slightly thereafter. The observed trajectory of precision decrease across reports was better captured as a discontinuous rather than an exponential function, suggesting that items were reported from different states in visual WM. The following 3 experiments replicated these findings. In particular, they showed that the observed drop could not be explained by a retro-cueing benefit of the first report, a longer delay duration for later reports or a visual interference effect of the first report. Instead, executive interference of the first report reduced precision of subsequent reports. Together, the results show that a sequential whole-report procedure allows the assessment of qualitatively different states in visual WM. (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.789543. Epub 2013 May 10. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014. PMID: 23663175
-
Recall cues interfere with retrieval from visuospatial working memory.Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):288-305. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12374. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Br J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30604426 Free PMC article.
-
No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.Psychol Aging. 2016 Aug;31(5):456-70. doi: 10.1037/pag0000107. Epub 2016 Jun 2. Psychol Aging. 2016. PMID: 27253868
-
Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:20-31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12603. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015. PMID: 25557544 Review.
-
New perspectives on binding in visual working memory.Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):207-244. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12345. Epub 2018 Oct 8. Br J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30295318 Review.
Cited by
-
Decoding of Working Memory Contents in Auditory Cortex Is Not Distractor-Resistant.J Neurosci. 2023 May 3;43(18):3284-3293. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1890-22.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 21. J Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36944488 Free PMC article.
-
Visual working memory models of delayed estimation do not generalize to whole-report tasks.J Vis. 2024 Jul 2;24(7):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.7.16. J Vis. 2024. PMID: 39058482 Free PMC article.
-
Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory.Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1761-1767. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x. Epub 2022 Nov 27. Psychol Res. 2023. PMID: 36436109
-
Transdiagnostic comparison of visual working memory capacity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Apr 2;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00217-x. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021. PMID: 33797645 Free PMC article.
-
Interference between items stored for distinct tasks in visual working memory.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1461-1473. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02657-w. Epub 2023 Jan 31. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 36720779 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources