Reports of unintended consequences of financial incentives to improve management of hypertension
- PMID: 28934258
- PMCID: PMC5608267
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184856
Reports of unintended consequences of financial incentives to improve management of hypertension
Abstract
Background: Given the increase in financial-incentive programs nationwide, many physicians and physician groups are concerned about potential unintended consequences of providing financial incentives to improve quality of care. However, few studies examine whether actual unintended consequences result from providing financial incentives to physicians. We sought to document the extent to which the unintended consequences discussed in the literature were observable in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of financial incentives.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative observational study nested within a larger RCT of financial incentives to improve hypertension care. We conducted 30-minute telephone interviews with primary care personnel at facilities participating in the RCT housed at12 geographically dispersed Veterans Affairs Medical Centers nationwide. Participants answered questions about unintended effects, clinic team dynamics, organizational impact on care delivery, study participation. We employed a blend of inductive and deductive qualitative techniques for analysis.
Participants: Sixty-five participants were recruited from RCT enrollees and personnel not enrolled in the larger RCT, plus one primary care leader per site.
Results: Emergent themes included possible patient harm, emphasis on documentation over improving care, reduced professional morale, and positive spillover. All discussions of unintended consequences involving patient harm were only concerns, not actual events. Several unintended consequences concerned ancillary initiatives for quality improvement (e.g., practice guidelines and performance measurement systems) rather than financial incentives.
Conclusions: Many unintended consequences of financial incentives noted were either only concerns or attributable to ancillary quality-improvement initiatives. Actual unintended consequences included improved documentation of care without necessarily improving actual care, and positive unintended consequences.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00302718.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1042-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276303. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24026599 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol.Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 3;6:114. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-114. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21967830 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences.Ann Fam Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;7(2):121-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.946. Ann Fam Med. 2009. PMID: 19273866 Free PMC article.
-
Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):265-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006. Ann Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 16908917 Review.
-
[Quality improvement in primary care. Financial incentives related to quality indicators in Europe].Orv Hetil. 2013 Jul 14;154(28):1096-101. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29631. Orv Hetil. 2013. PMID: 23835354 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229098. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29098. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36044216 Free PMC article.
-
Pay-for-Performance and Veteran Care in the VHA and the Community: a Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4444-4. Epub 2018 Apr 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29700789 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 33852143 Free PMC article.
-
Financial incentives linked to quality improvement projects in Swedish primary care: a model for improving quality of care.BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 12;8(2):e000402. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000402. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Qual. 2019. PMID: 31259276 Free PMC article.
-
Incentivizing performance in health care: a rapid review, typology and qualitative study of unintended consequences.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 23;22(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08032-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35606747 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
-
- Powell AA, White KM, Partin MR, Halek K, Christianson JB, Neil B et al. Unintended consequences of implementing a national performance measurement system into local practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(4): 405–412. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1906-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4): 265–272. - PubMed
-
- Petersen LA, Simpson K, Pietz K, Urech TH, Hysong SJ, Profit J, et al. Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(10):1042–1050. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276303 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Campbell SM, McDonald R, Lester H. The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3): 228–234. doi: 10.1370/afm.844 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical