Functional neural networks of honesty and dishonesty in children: Evidence from graph theory analysis
- PMID: 28935904
- PMCID: PMC5608888
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11754-4
Functional neural networks of honesty and dishonesty in children: Evidence from graph theory analysis
Abstract
The present study examined how different brain regions interact with each other during spontaneous honest vs. dishonest communication. More specifically, we took a complex network approach based on the graph-theory to analyze neural response data when children are spontaneously engaged in honest or dishonest acts. Fifty-nine right-handed children between 7 and 12 years of age participated in the study. They lied or told the truth out of their own volition. We found that lying decreased both the global and local efficiencies of children's functional neural network. This finding, for the first time, suggests that lying disrupts the efficiency of children's cortical network functioning. Further, it suggests that the graph theory based network analysis is a viable approach to study the neural development of deception.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Behavioral dishonesty in multiscenes: Associations with trait honesty and neural patterns during (dis)honesty video-watching.Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jun 1;45(8):e26710. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26710. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. PMID: 38853713 Free PMC article.
-
The neural basis of dishonest decisions that serve to harm or help the target.Brain Cogn. 2014 Oct;90:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 28. Brain Cogn. 2014. PMID: 24983819
-
Automatic honesty forgoing reward acquisition and punishment avoidance: a functional MRI investigation.Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 27;28(14):879-883. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000848. Neuroreport. 2017. PMID: 28746066 Free PMC article.
-
How the brain shapes deception: an integrated review of the literature.Neuroscientist. 2011 Oct;17(5):560-74. doi: 10.1177/1073858410393359. Epub 2011 Mar 30. Neuroscientist. 2011. PMID: 21454323 Review.
-
Cognitive control and dishonesty.Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022. PMID: 35840475 Review.
Cited by
-
Neonatal brain resting-state functional connectivity imaging modalities.Photoacoustics. 2018 Feb 2;10:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.01.003. eCollection 2018 Jun. Photoacoustics. 2018. PMID: 29511627 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sophisticated Deception in Junior Middle School Students: An ERP Study.Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 11;9:2675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02675. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30687155 Free PMC article.
-
Brain language networks and cognitive outcomes in children with frontotemporal lobe epilepsy.Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Oct 27;17:1253529. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1253529. eCollection 2023. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37964801 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Reward System in Dishonest Behavior: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.Brain Topogr. 2021 Jan;34(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00804-2. Epub 2020 Nov 1. Brain Topogr. 2021. PMID: 33135142
-
Reputation risk during dishonest social decision-making modulates anterior insular and cingulate cortex activity and connectivity.Commun Biol. 2023 Apr 29;6(1):475. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04827-w. Commun Biol. 2023. PMID: 37120439 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vrij A, Akehurst L, Brown L, Mann S. Detecting lies in young children, adolescents and adults. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2006;20:1225–1237. doi: 10.1002/acp.1278. - DOI
-
- Hartshorne, H. & May, M. S. Studies in the nature of character: Studies in deceit. (Macmillan,1928).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources