Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 31;14(3):323-334.
doi: 10.1007/s10433-017-0414-7. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review

Affiliations

Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review

S Bunt et al. Eur J Ageing. .

Abstract

Social frailty is a rather unexplored concept. In this paper, the concept of social frailty among older people is explored utilizing a scoping review. In the first stage, 42 studies related to social frailty of older people were compiled from scientific databases and analyzed. In the second stage, the findings of this literature were structured using the social needs concept of Social Production Function theory. As a result, it was concluded that social frailty can be defined as a continuum of being at risk of losing, or having lost, resources that are important for fulfilling one or more basic social needs during the life span. Moreover, the results of this scoping review indicate that not only the (threat of) absence of social resources to fulfill basic social needs should be a component of the concept of social frailty, but also the (threat of) absence of social behaviors and social activities, as well as (threat of) the absence of self-management abilities. This conception of social frailty provides opportunities for future research, and guidelines for practice and policy.

Keywords: Scoping review; Social frailty; Social needs; Social vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual model of social frailty with the various types of social and general resources (or restrictions), social behaviors and activities, and self-management abilities all in the function of adding to (or affecting) social needs fulfillment. Asterisks negatively formulated

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alvarado BE, Zunzunegui MV, Beland F, Bamvita JM. Life course social and health conditions linked to frailty in Latin American older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:1399–1406. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.12.1399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ament BH, de Vugt ME, Koomen FM, Jansen MW, Verhey FR, Kempen GI. Resources as a protective factor for negative outcomes of frailty in elderly people. Gerontology. 2012;58:391–397. doi: 10.1159/000336041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrew MK, Mitnitski AB. Different ways to think about frailty? Am J Med. 2008;121:e21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrew MK, Rockwood K. Social vulnerability predicts cognitive decline in a prospective cohort of older Canadians. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(319–325):e1. - PubMed
    1. Andrew MK, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K. Social vulnerability, frailty and mortality in elderly people. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types