Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 7:8:1485.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01485. eCollection 2017.

Assessing the Formation of Experience-Based Gender Expectations in an Implicit Learning Scenario

Affiliations

Assessing the Formation of Experience-Based Gender Expectations in an Implicit Learning Scenario

Anton Öttl et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The present study investigates the formation of new word-referent associations in an implicit learning scenario, using a gender-coded artificial language with spoken words and visual referents. Previous research has shown that when participants are explicitly instructed about the gender-coding system underlying an artificial lexicon, they monitor the frequency of exposure to male vs. female referents within this lexicon, and subsequently use this probabilistic information to predict the gender of an upcoming referent. In an explicit learning scenario, the auditory and visual gender cues are necessarily highlighted prior to acqusition, and the effects previously observed may therefore depend on participants' overt awareness of these cues. To assess whether the formation of experience-based expectations is dependent on explicit awareness of the underlying coding system, we present data from an experiment in which gender-coding was acquired implicitly, thereby reducing the likelihood that visual and auditory gender cues are used strategically during acquisition. Results show that even if the gender coding system was not perfectly mastered (as reflected in the number of gender coding errors), participants develop frequency based expectations comparable to those previously observed in an explicit learning scenario. In line with previous findings, participants are quicker at recognizing a referent whose gender is consistent with an induced expectation than one whose gender is inconsistent with an induced expectation. At the same time however, eyetracking data suggest that these expectations may surface earlier in an implicit learning scenario. These findings suggest that experience-based expectations are robust against manner of acquisition, and contribute to understanding why similar expectations observed in the activation of stereotypes during the processing of natural language stimuli are difficult or impossible to suppress.

Keywords: artificial language; categorization; experience-based probabilities; frequencies of exposure; gender representations; implicit learning; visual world eyetracking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic representation of the structure underlying the pseudowords and how stems and suffixes relate to different visual features (character and gender respectively) of the referents. Three out of 12 word stems and character pairs are exemplified here. (B) Example of how presentation frequencies for male vs. female versions of the same imaginary figures were used to induce biased gender likelihoods. Originally published in Öttl and Behne (2016).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Different trial types used in the post-test. Originally published in Öttl and Behne (2016).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Performance during traing blocks. Boxes represent median values and upper and lower quartiles. (A) Overall accuracy. (B) Gender-coding errors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean response times for correct responses according to trial type and presentation frequencies. Error bars represent SE.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proportion of fixations toward the target image as a function of time, plotted separately for no competitor trials (A) and target competitor trials (B). Blue lines represent fixation proportions toward the three distractor images, which in (B) features a target competitor. Dotted lines represent approximate acoustic onsets and offsets for the auditory stimuli, while the solid lines include a 200 ms shift to account for the temporal lag between language processing and eye movement execution.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fixation proportions toward the target according to its frequency (no competitor trials).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Gazedata from target competitor trials (image pair fixations only). Mean proportions represent fixations toward the male member of the pair.

Similar articles

References

    1. Baayen R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Barr D. J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2014). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7). Available online at: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
    1. Blender Foundation (2012). Blender - a 3D Modelling and Rendering Package. Amsterdam: Blender Online Community, Blender Institute.
    1. Boersma P., Weenink D. (2017). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Glot Int. 6.0.28, 341–345. Available online at: http://www.praat.org/

LinkOut - more resources