Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Nov;117(11):2335-2354.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3720-z. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis

A Manca et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Cross-education (CE) of strength is a well-known phenomenon whereby exercise of one limb can induce strength gains in the contralateral untrained limb. The only available meta-analyses on CE, which date back to a decade ago, estimated a modest 7.8% increase in contralateral strength following unilateral training. However, in recent years new evidences have outlined larger contralateral gains, which deserve to be systematically evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to appraise current data on CE and determine its overall magnitude of effect.

Methods: Five databases were searched from inception to December 2016. All randomized controlled trials focusing on unilateral resistance training were carefully checked by two reviewers who also assessed the eligibility of the identified trials and extracted data independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool.

Results: Thirty-one studies entered the meta-analysis. Data from 785 subjects were pooled and subgroup analyses by body region (upper/lower limb) and type of training (isometric/concentric/eccentric/isotonic-dynamic) were performed. The pooled estimate of CE was a significant 11.9% contralateral increase (95% CI 9.1-14.8; p < 0.00001; upper limb: + 9.4%, p < 0.00001; lower limb: + 16.4%, p < 0.00001). Significant CE effects were induced by isometric (8.2%; p = 0.0003), concentric (11.3%; p < 0.00001), eccentric (17.7%; p = 0.003) and isotonic-dynamic training (15.9%; p < 0.00001), although a high risk of bias was detected across the studies.

Conclusions: Unilateral resistance training induces significant contraction type-dependent gains in the contralateral untrained limb. Methodological issues in the included studies are outlined to provide guidance for a reliable quantification of CE in future studies.

Keywords: Contralateral training; Meta-analysis; Resistance training; Strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1188-99 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1978 Dec 15;40(1):45-55 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Oct;116(10 ):1993-2005 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1975 Jan;18(1):9-16 - PubMed
    1. J Exerc Rehabil. 2015 Apr 30;11(2):67-73 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms