Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Mar;22(3):355-363.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0.

Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Nigel J Lee et al. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Backgound Partographs are used in many labour settings to provide a pictorial overview of a woman's cervical dilation pattern in the first stage of labor and to alert clinicians to slow progress possibly requiring intervention. Recent reviews called for large trials to establish the efficacy of partographs to improve birth outcomes whilst highlighting issues of clinician compliance with use. Previous studies have also reported issues with participant recruitment related to concerns regarding the possibility of a longer labour. Objectives We sought to compare a standard partograph with an action line, to a newly designed partograph with a stepped line, to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a larger clinical trial. Methods A pragmatic, single-blind randomised trial wherein low-risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term were randomized to an action-line or stepped-line partograph. First stage labour management was guided by the allocated partograph. Primary outcomes included the proportion of eligible women recruited, reasons for failed recruitment and compliance with partograph use. Secondary outcomes included rates of intervention, mode of birth, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results Of the 384 potentially eligible participants, 38% (149/384) were approached. Of these 77% (116/149) consented, with 85% (99/116) randomized, only nine women approached (6%) declined to participate. A further 9% (14/149) who were consented antenatally were not eligible at onset of labor and 7% (10/149) of women approached in the birth suite but did not meet the inclusion criteria. Compliance with partograph completion was 65% (action) versus 84% (dystocia line). Conclusions for Practice Participant recruitment to a larger randomized controlled trial comparing new labour management guidelines to standard care is feasible. Effective strategies to improve partograph completion compliance would be required to maintain trial fidelity.

Keywords: Action line partograph; First stage labor; Labor dystocia; Partogram; Partograph; Stepped line partograph.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J. 1973 Jul 21;3(5872):135-7 - PubMed
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972 Jul;79(7):599-602 - PubMed
    1. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Dec;20(4):235-49 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1281-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):753.e1-3 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources