Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial
- PMID: 28936715
- DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0
Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial
Abstract
Backgound Partographs are used in many labour settings to provide a pictorial overview of a woman's cervical dilation pattern in the first stage of labor and to alert clinicians to slow progress possibly requiring intervention. Recent reviews called for large trials to establish the efficacy of partographs to improve birth outcomes whilst highlighting issues of clinician compliance with use. Previous studies have also reported issues with participant recruitment related to concerns regarding the possibility of a longer labour. Objectives We sought to compare a standard partograph with an action line, to a newly designed partograph with a stepped line, to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a larger clinical trial. Methods A pragmatic, single-blind randomised trial wherein low-risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term were randomized to an action-line or stepped-line partograph. First stage labour management was guided by the allocated partograph. Primary outcomes included the proportion of eligible women recruited, reasons for failed recruitment and compliance with partograph use. Secondary outcomes included rates of intervention, mode of birth, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results Of the 384 potentially eligible participants, 38% (149/384) were approached. Of these 77% (116/149) consented, with 85% (99/116) randomized, only nine women approached (6%) declined to participate. A further 9% (14/149) who were consented antenatally were not eligible at onset of labor and 7% (10/149) of women approached in the birth suite but did not meet the inclusion criteria. Compliance with partograph completion was 65% (action) versus 84% (dystocia line). Conclusions for Practice Participant recruitment to a larger randomized controlled trial comparing new labour management guidelines to standard care is feasible. Effective strategies to improve partograph completion compliance would be required to maintain trial fidelity.
Keywords: Action line partograph; First stage labor; Labor dystocia; Partogram; Partograph; Stepped line partograph.
Similar articles
-
Pilot Study of Physiologic Partograph Use Among Low-Risk, Nulliparous Women With Spontaneous Labor Onset.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):235-41. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12442. Epub 2016 Feb 24. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016. PMID: 26917257
-
Comparing compliance with commencement and use of two partograph designs for women in active labour: A randomised controlled trial.Women Birth. 2023 Feb;36(1):e17-e24. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Women Birth. 2023. PMID: 35400605 Clinical Trial.
-
The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):340-348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31991-3. Epub 2018 Dec 20. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30581039 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of the partograph - Current thinking.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 32321672 Review.
-
Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 7. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 32247770
Cited by
-
Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 22;19(3):e0298046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298046. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38517902 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of painless delivery on the maternal and neonatal outcomes under the guidance of new concept of labor.Am J Transl Res. 2021 Nov 15;13(11):12973-12979. eCollection 2021. Am J Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34956513 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical