Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Jan;141(1):180e-181e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003970.

Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q

Rachael M Payne  1 , Charalampos Siotos, Michele A Manahan, Gedge D Rosson, Carisa M Cooney
Affiliations
Comment

Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q

Rachael M Payne et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Breast cancer and reconstruction: Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1046e1055e.
    1. Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q: Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:846853.
    1. Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Understanding the health burden of macromastia: Normative data for the BREAST-Q reduction module. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:846e853e.
    1. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott A, Alderman A, Pusic AL. Interpreting clinical differences in BREAST-Q scores: Minimal important difference. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:173e175e.
    1. Duraes EF, Durand P, Duraes LC, et al. Comparison of preoperative quality of life in breast reconstruction, breast aesthetic and non-breast plastic surgery patients: A cross-sectional study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:14781485.