Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;141(1):103e-112e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003930.

Implant Porosity and the Foreign Body Response

Affiliations
Review

Implant Porosity and the Foreign Body Response

Sumanas W Jordan et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The biocompatibility of prosthetic mesh is dependent on a number of physicochemical properties that ultimately incite an optimal foreign body response. The magnitude and character of the foreign body response directly affect the clinical success of the hernia repair, with too little scar resulting in bulge or hernia recurrence and too much scar causing mesh wrinkling and pain. Moreover, it is important to consider the effect of a sustained foreign body response and scar remodeling on the combined strength of the mesh-tissue construct over time. Understanding key elements that determine the foreign body response, such as implant porosity, surface area, and filament size, is critical to the performance of surgery. New absorbable materials introduce the additional variable of durability and persistence of the foreign body response after the foreign body itself has dissolved. In this review, we discuss the experimental and clinical literature relating the quality of the foreign body response to the physical attributes of implants in an effort to demystify prosthetic mesh selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Major MR, Wong VW, Nelson ER, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. The foreign body response: At the interface of surgery and bioengineering. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:14891498.
    1. Majno G. The Healing Hand: Man and Wound in the Ancient World. 1975.Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    1. Voorhees AB Jr. The development of arterial prostheses: A personal view. Arch Surg. 1985;120:289295.
    1. Sauvage LR, Smith JC, Davis CC, Rittenhouse EA, Hall DG, Mansfield PB. Kambic HE, Kantrowitz A, Sung P. Dacron arterial grafts: Comparative structures and basis for successful use of current prostheses. In: Vascular Graft Update, Safety and Performance. 1986:Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1624.
    1. Wesolowski SA, Fries CC, Karlson KE, De Bakey M, Sawyer PN. Porosity: Primary determinant of ultimate fate of synthetic vascular grafts. Surgery 1961;50:9196.

MeSH terms

Substances