Difficult implant removals
- PMID: 28938375
- DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000416
Difficult implant removals
Abstract
Purpose of review: Subdermal contraceptive implant insertions have rapidly increased worldwide. These devices are usually removed 3-5 years after insertion. Although removals are generally straightforward, difficult removals can occur. This review discusses the overall approach to potentially problematic removals and the appropriate steps to avoid complications and safely remove implants.
Recent findings: Given the rapid uptake of contraceptive implants and subsequent need for removals, an Implants Removal Task Force was formed to create standard protocols for difficult implant removals worldwide. These protocols detail how to identify a nonpalpable implant and the subsequent steps needed for safe removals that avoid vascular or neurological complications.
Summary: Rapid uptake of subdermal implants has created a need for a comprehensive approach in the unlikely setting of a difficult implant removal. Standard protocols now exist to aid clinicians in the safe removal of these implants.
Similar articles
-
Closing the Gap: Ensuring Access to and Quality of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services is Essential to Rights-based Contraceptive Care.Afr J Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;23(4):19-26. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i4.3. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 32227736
-
"Pop-out" method of levonorgestrel implant removal.Contraception. 1999 Jun;59(6):383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00048-7. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10518233
-
Influence of age on tolerability, safety and effectiveness of subdermal contraceptive implants.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;38(7):979-984. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1430753. Epub 2018 Mar 19. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. PMID: 29553853
-
Difficult etonogestrel implant removals in South Africa: A review of 74 referred cases.Contraception. 2020 Aug;102(2):129-132. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 24. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32339484 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Difficult Insertions and Removals.Am Fam Physician. 2018 Sep 1;98(5):304-309. Am Fam Physician. 2018. PMID: 30216029 Review.
Cited by
-
Reversible median nerve neuropathy and local muscle irritation resulting from blind removal attempts of etonogestrel contraceptive implant: a case report.Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Dec 1;8(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00257-5. Contracept Reprod Med. 2023. PMID: 38037175 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive subcutaneous device migration: what does an orthopaedic surgeon need to know? A case report and literature review.Acta Biomed. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):232-237. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9498. Acta Biomed. 2020. PMID: 32555102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal.Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Oct 25;3:899543. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.899543. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36386435 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials