Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
- PMID: 28940110
- PMCID: PMC5890422
- DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1914-5
Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Abstract
Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by simplifying a complex 3D bone structure to a 2D projection and is not equally effective for explaining fracture strength in women and men. Unlike DXA, subject-specific quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) estimates fracture strength using 3D bone mineral distribution and geometry. By using experimentally-measured femoral stiffness and strength from a one hundred sample cadaveric cohort that included variations in sex and age, we wanted to determine if QCT/FEA estimates were able to better predict the experimental variations than DXA/aBMD. For each femur, DXA/aBMD was assessed and a QCT/FEA model was developed to estimate femoral stiffness and strength. Then, the femur was mechanically tested to fracture in a sideways fall on the hip position to measure stiffness and strength. DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA estimates were compared for their sensitivity to sex and age with multivariate statistical analyses. When comparing the measured data with DXA/aBMD predictions, both age and sex were significant (p ≤ 0.0398) for both femoral stiffness and strength. However, QCT/FEA predictions of stiffness and strength showed sex was insignificant (p ≥ 0.23). Age was still significant (p ≤ 0.0072). These results indicate that QCT/FEA, unlike DXA/aBMD, accounted for bone differences due to sex.
Keywords: Aging; Bone biomechanics; Finite element analysis; Hip fracture; Sex differences.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.Bone. 2017 Dec;105:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Bone. 2017. PMID: 28739416
-
A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1379-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2066-y. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 22810918 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Apr;222(3):367-75. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM307. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008. PMID: 18491705
-
Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018 Jun;16(3):216-223. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0438-8. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018. PMID: 29656377 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting bone strength from CT data: Clinical applications.Morphologie. 2019 Dec;103(343):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Morphologie. 2019. PMID: 31630964 Review.
Cited by
-
Triglyceride Can Predict the Discordance between QCT and DXA Screening for BMD in Old Female Patients.Dis Markers. 2020 Dec 27;2020:8898888. doi: 10.1155/2020/8898888. eCollection 2020. Dis Markers. 2020. PMID: 33425073 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical metric for skeletal biomechanics derived from spectral analysis of stiffness matrix.Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 3;11(1):15690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94998-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34344907 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Causality Between Bone Mineral Density and Cervical Spondylosis: Bidirectional and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study.J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 9;18:3463-3476. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S516682. eCollection 2025. J Pain Res. 2025. PMID: 40661227 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing radiomics techniques to isolate a single vertebral body from chest CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 4;25(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07903-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39367356 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of aging on mechanical properties of the femoral neck using an inverse method.Bone Rep. 2022 Nov 14;17:101638. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101638. eCollection 2022 Dec. Bone Rep. 2022. PMID: 36407416 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Augat P, Schorlemmer S. The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age and ageing. 2006;35:ii27–ii31. - PubMed
-
- Bousson V, Meunier A, Bergot C, Vicaut É, Rocha MA, Morais MH, Laval-Jeantet AM, Laredo JD. Distribution of intracortical porosity in human midfemoral cortex by age and gender. Journal of bone and mineral research. 2001;16:1308–1317. - PubMed
-
- Britz HM, Thomas CDL, Clement JG, Cooper DM. The relation of femoral osteon geometry to age, sex, height and weight. Bone. 2009;45:77–83. - PubMed
-
- Chen H, Shoumura S, Emura S, Bunai Y. Regional variations of vertebral trabecular bone microstructure with age and gender. Osteoporosis International. 2008;19:1473–1483. - PubMed
-
- Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. Journal of biomechanics. 1999;32:1013–1020. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical