Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors
- PMID: 28941948
- PMCID: PMC5714430
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31928-1
Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors
Abstract
Background: Limits on the frequency of whole blood donation exist primarily to safeguard donor health. However, there is substantial variation across blood services in the maximum frequency of donations allowed. We compared standard practice in the UK with shorter inter-donation intervals used in other countries.
Methods: In this parallel group, pragmatic, randomised trial, we recruited whole blood donors aged 18 years or older from 25 centres across England, UK. By use of a computer-based algorithm, men were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 12-week (standard) versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, and women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 16-week (standard) versus 14-week versus 12-week intervals. Participants were not masked to their allocated intervention group. The primary outcome was the number of donations over 2 years. Secondary outcomes related to safety were quality of life, symptoms potentially related to donation, physical activity, cognitive function, haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and deferrals because of low haemoglobin. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN24760606, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants.
Findings: 45 263 whole blood donors (22 466 men, 22 797 women) were recruited between June 11, 2012, and June 15, 2014. Data were analysed for 45 042 (99·5%) participants. Men were randomly assigned to the 12-week (n=7452) versus 10-week (n=7449) versus 8-week (n=7456) groups; and women to the 16-week (n=7550) versus 14-week (n=7567) versus 12-week (n=7568) groups. In men, compared with the 12-week group, the mean amount of blood collected per donor over 2 years increased by 1·69 units (95% CI 1·59-1·80; approximately 795 mL) in the 8-week group and by 0·79 units (0·69-0·88; approximately 370 mL) in the 10-week group (p<0·0001 for both). In women, compared with the 16-week group, it increased by 0·84 units (95% CI 0·76-0·91; approximately 395 mL) in the 12-week group and by 0·46 units (0·39-0·53; approximately 215 mL) in the 14-week group (p<0·0001 for both). No significant differences were observed in quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function across randomised groups. However, more frequent donation resulted in more donation-related symptoms (eg, tiredness, breathlessness, feeling faint, dizziness, and restless legs, especially among men [for all listed symptoms]), lower mean haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and more deferrals for low haemoglobin (p<0·0001 for each) than those observed in the standard frequency groups.
Interpretation: Over 2 years, more frequent donation than is standard practice in the UK collected substantially more blood without having a major effect on donors' quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function, but resulted in more donation-related symptoms, deferrals, and iron deficiency.
Funding: NHS Blood and Transplant, National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Lessons from the INTERVAL study.Lancet. 2018 Jun 30;391(10140):2604-2605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30795-5. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30070219 No abstract available.
-
Lessons from the INTERVAL study.Lancet. 2018 Jun 30;391(10140):2605-2606. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30791-8. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30070220 No abstract available.
-
Lessons from the INTERVAL study - Authors' reply.Lancet. 2018 Jun 30;391(10140):2606. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30760-8. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30070221 No abstract available.
-
Ironing out frequent blood donation.Lancet Haematol. 2019 Oct;6(10):e492-e493. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30162-0. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Lancet Haematol. 2019. PMID: 31383582 No abstract available.
References
-
- WHO Blood safety and availability. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs279/en/ (accessed June 28, 2017).
-
- Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services in the UK. http://www.transfusionguidelines.org/dsg (accessed June 28, 2017).
-
- Goldman M, Magnussen K, Gorlin J. International Forum regarding practices related to donor haemoglobin and iron. Vox Sang. 2016;111:449–455. - PubMed
-
- Karp JK, King KE. International variation in volunteer whole blood donor eligibility criteria. Transfusion. 2010;50:507–513. - PubMed
-
- Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM. Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA. 2016;316:2025–2035. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
