Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study
- PMID: 28942685
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546517728718
Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study
Abstract
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years.
Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [ P < .05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [ P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [ P < .05]).
Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
Keywords: arthroscopy; double row; rotator cuff repair; shoulder; single row; tendon healing; young population.
Similar articles
-
Longitudinal Long-term Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Follow-up After Single-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical Superiority of Structural Tendon Integrity.Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1283-1288. doi: 10.1177/0363546517689873. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28272899
-
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26055919
-
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22074913 Clinical Trial.
-
Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row technique for repairing rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Orthop Surg. 2014 Nov;6(4):300-12. doi: 10.1111/os.12139. Orthop Surg. 2014. PMID: 25430714 Free PMC article.
-
Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration.Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Aug 7. Arthroscopy. 2009. PMID: 19896055
Cited by
-
Rotator cuff retear after repair surgery: comparison between experienced and inexperienced surgeons.Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Sep;24(3):135-140. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00073. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021. PMID: 34488293 Free PMC article.
-
[Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. A systematic review.].Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Sep 29;80(3):252-274. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n3.41161. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023. PMID: 37773337 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Rotator cuff repairs with all-suture tape anchors: no difference in outcomes between with or without all-suture tape anchors.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Sep;31(9):4060-4067. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07454-4. Epub 2023 May 24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37226010
-
Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Improvement of Pain and Function in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Bias Assessment.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):2028-2041. doi: 10.1177/0363546519881423. Epub 2019 Nov 19. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31743037 Free PMC article.
-
No differences in histopathological degenerative changes found in acute, trauma-related rotator cuff tears compared with chronic, nontraumatic tears.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2521-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06884-w. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 35133449 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical