Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep;9(9S2):S415-S428.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.08.403.

A Focused Review of Safety Considerations in Cancer Rehabilitation

Susan Maltser  1 , Adrian Cristian  2 , Julie K Silver  3 , G Stephen Morris  4 , Nicole L Stout  5
Affiliations
Review

A Focused Review of Safety Considerations in Cancer Rehabilitation

Susan Maltser et al. PM R. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Cancer and its treatments introduce various adverse effects that may affect survivors' physical, cognitive and psychological functioning. Frequently both tolerance to activity and exercise are affected as well. Rehabilitation providers should have substantive knowledge about the effect of cancer progression and common side effects associated with antineoplastic treatment to safely integrate rehabilitation interventions. Rehabilitation may mitigate loss of function and disability; however, these patients are among the most medically complex that providers treat. This report provides a focused review that synthesizes the current evidence regarding disease progression and oncology-directed treatment side effects within the context of safety considerations for rehabilitation interventions throughout the continuum of cancer care. Descriptive information regarding the evidence for precautions and contraindications is provided so that rehabilitation providers can promote a safe plan of rehabilitation care. It is incumbent upon but also challenging for rehabilitation providers to stay up to date on the many advances in cancer treatment, and there are many gaps in the literature regarding safety issues. Although further research is needed to inform care, this review provides clinicians with a framework to assess patients with the goal of safely initiating rehabilitation interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2016;66(4):271–289. - PubMed
    1. Marchese VG, Morris GS, Gilchrist L, et al. Screening for chemotherapy adverse late effects. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2011;27(3):234–243.
    1. Partridge J, Harari D, Martin F, Dhesi J. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(s1):8–16. - PubMed
    1. Stout NL, Binkley JM, Schmitz KH, et al. A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(S8):2191–2200. - PubMed
    1. Carli F, Silver JK, Feldman LS, et al. Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. 2017;28(1):49–64. - PubMed