Timing the Mode Switch in a Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey: An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact on Final Response Rates, Key Estimates, and Costs
- PMID: 28943717
- PMCID: PMC5608089
- DOI: 10.1177/0894439316654611
Timing the Mode Switch in a Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey: An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact on Final Response Rates, Key Estimates, and Costs
Abstract
Mixed-mode surveys need to determine a number of design parameters that may have a strong influence on costs and errors. In a sequential mixed-mode design with web followed by telephone, one of these decisions is when to switch modes. The web mode is relatively inexpensive but produces lower response rates. The telephone mode complements the web mode in that it is relatively expensive but produces higher response rates. Among the potential negative consequences, delaying the switch from web to telephone may lead to lower response rates if the effectiveness of the prenotification contact materials is reduced by longer time lags, or if the additional e-mail reminders to complete the web survey annoy the sampled person. On the positive side, delaying the switch may decrease the costs of the survey. We evaluate these costs and errors by experimentally testing four different timings (1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks) for the mode switch in a web-telephone survey. This experiment was conducted on the fourth wave of a longitudinal study of the mental health of soldiers in the U.S. Army. We find that the different timings of the switch in the range of 1-4 weeks do not produce differences in final response rates or key estimates but longer delays before switching do lead to lower costs.
Keywords: mixed-mode survey; nonresponse bias; survey costs.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Akl EA, Maroun N, Klocke RA, Montori V, Schünemann HJ. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2005;58:425–429. - PubMed
-
- American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard dispositions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 8th. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions2....
-
- Brewer NTP, Hallman WKP, Fiedler NP, Kipen HMMD. Why do people report better health by phone than by mail? Medical Care. 2004;42:875–883. - PubMed
-
- Couper MP. Measuring survey quality in a CASIC environment; Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, TX; 1998. pp. 41–49.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources