Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;14(4):3997-4004.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6654. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

Hepatectomy for spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma without portal triad clamping

Affiliations

Hepatectomy for spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma without portal triad clamping

Zhi-Ming Wang et al. Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Hepatectomy without portal triad clamping may decrease the incidence of liver injury; however, the effects of hepatectomy without portal triad clamping in the treatment of spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (SRHCC) remain unclear. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the therapeutic value of hepatectomy without portal triad clamping in the treatment of patients with SRHCC. The present study retrospectively reviewed patients with SRHCC who received hepatectomy without portal triad clamping (non-clamping group) and the therapeutic efficacy was compared with that of 20 patients with SRHCC undergoing the same surgery in the presence of portal triad clamping (clamping group). Following hepatectomy, the non-clamping group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of acute liver failure compared with the clamping group (P<0.05). No significant differences in operative time, intra-operative blood loss, disease-free or overall survival times between the two groups were identified (all P>0.05). At 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery, the non-clamping group exhibited significantly lower alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin serum levels compared with the clamping group (all P<0.05). Hepatectomy without portal triad clamping may decrease the incidence of liver injury and liver failure in patients with SRHCC, suggesting that it may be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy.

Keywords: hepatectomy; portal triad clamping; spontaneous rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Levels of (A) Hb, (B) PLT, (C) ALT, (D) AST, (E) TBil, (F) PT, (G) KPTT, (H) FBI and (I) AFP prior to, and 7 and 14 days after, clamping or non-clamping hepatectomy (mean ± standard deviation). At 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery, the non-clamping group exhibited significantly lower serum levels of ALT, AST and TBil compared with the clamping group (all P<0.05). Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TBil, total bilirubin; PT, prothrombin time; KPTT, kaolin partial thromboplastin time; FBI, fibrinogen; AFP, α-fetoprotein.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Prior to surgery, computed tomography scans of the liver identified discontinuity of the liver tumor capsule, cancer rupture and a crescent hematoma at the site of rupture (arrowhead) and necrotic foci in cancer (arrow). (B) At 2 weeks after surgery, computed tomography scans revealed no space-occupying lesions in the liver, and surrounding hematomas and hemoperitoneum were not observed.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pathological examination of liver specimens from clamping and non-clamping groups demonstrated: (A) Disordered hepatic cords, dark, multipolar and heteromorphic nuclei and mitose atypique identifying moderate differentiation hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow), (hematoxylin and eosin; magnification, ×100); (B) discontinuity of small venous wall, venous rupture and thrombi at the site of rupture (hematoxylin and eosin; magnification, ×400).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Cumulative and (B) recurrence-free survival rates of patients with spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy with or without portal triad clamping. No significant difference in survival rate between these two groups was identified.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yeh CN, Lee WC, Jeng LB, Chen MF, Yu MC. Spontaneous tumour rupture and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1125–1129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02188.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim PT, Su JC, Buczkowski AK, Schaeffer DF, Chung SW, Scudamore CH, Ho SG. Computed tomography and angiographic interventional features of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: Pictorial essay. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;57:159–168. - PubMed
    1. Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larson AM. Introduction to the revised American association for the study of liver diseases position paper on acute liver failure, 2011. Hepatology. 2012;55:965–967. doi: 10.1002/hep.25551. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lü XS, Zheng YS, Fan QQ. Liver resection for spontaneous rupture of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;2:23–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02835363. - DOI
    1. Battula N, Madanur M, Priest O, Srinivasan P, O'Grady J, Heneghan MA, Bowles M, Muiesan P, Heaton N, Rela M. Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: A western experience. Am J Surg. 2009;197:164–167. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.016. - DOI - PubMed