Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):999.
doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.999. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

Factors affecting pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion in community pharmacy: A structural equation modeling approach

Affiliations

Factors affecting pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion in community pharmacy: A structural equation modeling approach

Sujin Nitadpakorn et al. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Background: The concept of customer engagement and devotion has been applied in various service businesses to keep the customers with business However, a limited number of studies were performed to examine the context of customer engagement and devotion in pharmacy business which focus on the impact of customer perceptions about pharmacists, perceived quality of pharmacy structure, medication price strategy on pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion in a pharmacy providing pharmaceutical care to the customers.

Objective: This study aimed to assess a conceptual model depicting the relationships among customer perceptions about pharmacists, pharmacy quality structure, medication price, customer engagement, and customer devotion. And also aimed to assess and measure if there is a direct or indirect relationship between these factors.

Methods: A quantitative study was conducted by using self-administered questionnaires. Two hundred and fifty three customers who regularly visited the pharmacy were randomly recruited from a purposively selected 30 community pharmacies in Bangkok. The survey was completed during February to April 2016. A structural equation model (SEM) was used to assess the direct and indirect relationships between constructs.

Results: A total of 253/300 questionnaires were returned for analysis, and the response rate was 84%. Only perceptions about pharmacist in customers receiving professional pharmacy services was statically significant regarding relationship with pharmacy engagement (beta=0.45). Concurrently, the model from empirical data fit with the hypothetical model (p-value = 0.06, adjusted chi-square (CMIN/DF)=1.16, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI)=0.93, Comparatively Fit Index (CFI)=0.99, and Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA)=0.03).

Conclusion: The study confirmed the indirect positive influence of customer perceptions about pharmacist on pharmacy customer devotion in providing pharmacy services via pharmacy engagement It was customer perceptions about pharmacist that influenced customer retention, positive word of mouth and constructive advice to pharmacies, not quality of pharmacy structure and medication price. To create a long term impact on community pharmacy business, pharmacist is the key success factor.

Keywords: Commerce; Community Pharmacy Services; Consumer Behavior; Models; Patient Satisfaction; Pharmacies; Pharmacists; Professional-Patient Relations; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thailand; Theoretical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual model and hypotheses.
Dotted lines refer to non-significant path and Solid lines refer to significant path. H1: Customer engagement has a direct effect with customer devotion; H2: Perceived quality of pharmacy structure at community pharmacy providing professional pharmacy services has a direct effect with pharmacy customer devotion; H3: Perceived quality of pharmacy structure at community pharmacy providing professional pharmacy services has an indirect effect with pharmacy customer devotion via pharmacy engagement; H4: Customer perceptions about pharmacist at community pharmacy providing professional pharmacy services directly affect pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion; H5: Customer perceptions about pharmacist at community pharmacy providing professional pharmacy service has an indirect effect with pharmacy customer devotion via pharmacy engagement; H6: Medication price strategy has a direct effect with pharmacy customer devotion; H7: Medication price strategy has an indirect effect with pharmacy customer devotion via pharmacy engagement
Figure 2
Figure 2. Model predicting pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion in community pharmacy.
p-value=0.06, adjusted chi-square (CMIN/DF)=1.16, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI)=0.93, Comparatively Fit Index (CFI)=0.99, and Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA)=0.03 PAP: Customer perceptions about pharmacist; PQPS: perceived quality pharmacy structure; PS; price strategy; PE: pharmacy engagement; PCD: pharmacy customer devotion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prachachat News. Chain Drug Store prepared for AEC (Thai) 2014
    1. Smith B Customer Satisfaction Is the Wrong Measure. [accessed 22 August 2017];The Gallup Management Journal 2005. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/15850/customer-satisfaction-wrong-... .
    1. Van Doorn J, Lemon KN, Mittal V, Nass S, Pick D, Pirner P, Verhoef PC. Customer engagement behavior:theoretical foundations and research directions. J Serv Res. 2010;13(253):253–266. doi: 10.1177/1094670510375599. - DOI
    1. Castaldo S, Grosso M, Mallarini E, Rindone M. The missing path to gain customers loyalty in pharmacy retail:The role of the store in developing satisfaction and trust. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016;12(5):699–712. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrícia Antunes L, Gomes JJ, Cavaco AM. How pharmacist–patient communication determines pharmacy loyalty? Modeling relevant factors. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11(4):560–570. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.11.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources