Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):200-204.
doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539. eCollection 2017.

Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis

Zeki Özsoy  1 , Erdinç Yenidoğan  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis

Zeki Özsoy et al. Turk J Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to show the effectiveness of Alvarado score and its components to predict the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to find an optimum cut-off value for Alvarado score.

Material and methods: The patients who underwent surgical operation between January 2011 and January 2012 with the suspicion of acute appendicitis were included in the study. Their demographic and clinical features and histopathological results were retrieved from the medical records. They were divided into three groups according to their Alvarado scores. With the use of "receiver operating characteristic" curve analysis, the optimum cut-off value needed to make a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis was determined.

Results: In all, 156 patients were included into the study. The mean age was 31.41±13.27 years. Histopathologically, acute appendicitis was detected in 125 (80.1%) patients, and negative appendectomy was found in 31 patients (19.8%). Mean Alvarado score was 6.44±1.49. There was a significant correlation between negative appendectomy and low Alvarado score (p<0.001). The main component of Alvarado score that makes the difference was rebound. Fever higher than 37.3°C, rebound, loss of appetite, and existence of shifting pain were statistically differential components (p=0.042, p<0.001, p=0.045, p<0.001, respectively). The rate of correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis was maximum in group 3 (100%) and minimum in group 1 (21.7%). Optimum cut-off value for Alvarado score was 7.

Conclusion: Patients with an Alvarado score of over 7 can be taken into surgical operation without the need of imaging methods.

Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Alvarado Score; cut-off value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical management strategy by Alvarado Score and probability of appendicitis
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosis of acute appendicitis according to the Alvarado Scoring System
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Hashemy A, Seleem M. Appraisal of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in the adult. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:1229–1231. - PubMed
    1. Yildirim E, Karagülle E, Kirbaş I, Türk E, Hasdoğan B, Tekşam M, et al. Alvarado scores and pain onset in relation to multislice CT findings in acute appendicitis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008;14:14–18. - PubMed
    1. Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, Lee JH, Park JK, Moon HJ. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2013;79:101–106. - PubMed
    1. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004;91:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4464. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources