ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1
- PMID: 28945867
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1
Abstract
Background: The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) version 1.0 (v1.0) was published in May 2015 and was the first version of a validated and reproducible tool to assess the magnitude of clinical benefit from new cancer therapies. The ESMO-MCBS was designed to be a dynamic tool with planned revisions and updates based upon recognition of expanding needs and shortcomings identified since the last review.
Methods: The revision process for the ESMO-MCBS incorporates a nine-step process: Careful review of critiques and suggestions, and identification of problems in the application of v1.0; Identification of shortcomings for revision in the upcoming version; Proposal and evaluation of solutions to address identified shortcomings; Field testing of solutions; Preparation of a near-final revised version for peer review for reasonableness by members of the ESMO Faculty and Guidelines Committee; Amendments based on peer review for reasonableness; Near-final review by members of the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and the ESMO Executive Board; Final amendments; Final review and approval by members of the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and the ESMO Executive Board.
Results: Twelve issues for revision or amendment were proposed for consideration; proposed amendments were formulated for eight identified shortcomings. The proposed amendments are classified as either structural, technical, immunotherapy triggered or nuanced. All amendments were field tested in a wide range of studies comparing scores generated with ESMO-MCBS v1.0 and version 1.1 (v1.1).
Conclusions: ESMO-MCBS v1.1 incorporates 10 revisions and will allow for scoring of single-arm studies. Scoring remains very stable; revisions in v1.1 alter the scores of only 12 out of 118 comparative studies and facilitate scoring for single-arm studies.
Keywords: European Society for Medical Oncology; biostatistics; magnitude of clinical benefit scale; single arm studies.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Toxicity adjustment in the ESMO-MCBS: a gestalt approach?Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):520-521. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx540. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 28950299 No abstract available.
-
Guideposts on the journey to value.Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2325-2326. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx311. Ann Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28961824 No abstract available.
-
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Toxicity adjustment in the ESMO-MCBS: a Gestalt approach?' by Del Paggio.Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):521-522. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx649. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29045537 No abstract available.
-
Re-aligning the ASCO and ESMO clinical benefit frameworks for modern cancer therapies.Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):773-774. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx721. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29112709 No abstract available.
-
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Re-aligning the ASCO and ESMO clinical benefit frameworks or modern cancer therapies'.Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):774-775. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx747. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29161364 No abstract available.
-
Reply to the letter to the editor 'ESMO-MCBS v1.1: statistical and patient relevant shortcomings' by Emprechtinger et al.Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1335-1338. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy108. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29659680 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
