Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review
- PMID: 28945877
- PMCID: PMC5834030
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx501
Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review
Abstract
The importance of mutation identification for advanced colorectal cancer treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents is well established. However, due to delays in turnaround time, low-quality tissue samples, and/or lack of standardization of testing methods a significant proportion of patients are being treated without the information that Kirsten rat sarcoma and neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (RAS) testing can provide. The detection of mutated circulating tumor DNA by BEAMing technology addresses this gap in care and allows these patients to receive international guideline-recommended expanded RAS testing with rapid turnaround times. Furthermore, the overall concordance between OncoBEAM RAS colorectal cancer testing and standard of care tissue testing is very high (93.3%). This article presents an overview of the clinical utility and potential applications of this minimally invasive method, such as early detection of emergent resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. If appropriately implemented, BEAMing technology holds considerable promise to enhance the quality of patient care and improve clinical outcomes.
Keywords: EGFR; colorectal cancer; liquid biopsy; mutation testing; tumor resistance.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Similar articles
-
Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 26;19(11):3356. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113356. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30373199 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective multicenter real-world RAS mutation comparison between OncoBEAM-based liquid biopsy and tissue analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2018 Dec;119(12):1464-1470. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0293-5. Epub 2018 Nov 23. Br J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30467411 Free PMC article.
-
[Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detection Using BEAMing and Its Clinical Significance.].Rinsho Byori. 2016 May;64(4):400-406. Rinsho Byori. 2016. PMID: 29182806 Japanese.
-
Ongoing Clinical Trials and Future Research Scenarios of Circulating Tumor DNA for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2024 Dec;23(4):295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38519391 Review.
-
Role of circulating tumor DNA in the management of patients with colorectal cancer.Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;42(5):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29627453 Review.
Cited by
-
Plasma pre-treatment T790M relative allelic frequency in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer predicts treatment response to subsequent-line osimertinib.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Apr;10(4):1623-1634. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1125. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34012779 Free PMC article.
-
Liquid Biopsies, Novel Approaches and Future Directions.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;15(5):1579. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051579. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900369 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological Profiles Associated with Discordant RAS Mutational Status between Liquid and Tissue Biopsies in a Real-World Cohort of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;15(14):3578. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143578. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37509239 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal residual disease in solid tumors: an overview.Front Med. 2023 Aug;17(4):649-674. doi: 10.1007/s11684-023-1018-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Front Med. 2023. PMID: 37707677 Review.
-
Updates on Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Treatment Guidance.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 May 24;9:660924. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.660924. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34150757 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 7–30. - PubMed
-
- Qiu LX, Mao C, Zhang J. et al. Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2781–2787. - PubMed
-
- Douillard J-Y, Oliner KS, Siena S. et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1023–1034. - PubMed
-
- Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T. et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 1065–1075. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous