Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 24;7(10):122.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci7100122.

Changes in Cognition and Decision Making Capacity Following Brain Tumour Resection: Illustrated with Two Cases

Affiliations
Review

Changes in Cognition and Decision Making Capacity Following Brain Tumour Resection: Illustrated with Two Cases

Katie Veretennikoff et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Changes in cognition, behaviour and emotion frequently occur in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours. This impacts the ability to make considered decisions, especially following surgical resection, which is often overlooked in the management of patients. Moreover, the impact of cognitive deficits on decision making ability affects activities of daily living and functional independence. The assessment process to ascertain decision making capacity remains a matter of debate. One avenue for evaluating a patient's ability to make informed decisions in the context of brain tumour resection is neuropsychological assessment. This involves the assessment of a wide range of cognitive abilities on standard measurement tools, providing a robust approach to ascertaining capacity. Evidence has shown that a comprehensive and tailored neuropsychological assessment has greater sensitivity than brief cognitive screening tools to detect subtle and/or specific cognitive deficits in brain tumours. It is the precise nature and severity of any cognitive deficits that determines any implications for decision making capacity. This paper focuses on cognitive deficits and decision making capacity following surgical resection of both benign and malignant, and primary and secondary brain tumours in adult patients, and the implications for patients' ability to consent to future medical treatment and make decisions related to everyday activities.

Keywords: brain tumours; capacity; cognition; decision making; neuropsychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the approach to assess decision making capacity.

References

    1. Triebel K., Martin R., Nabors L., Marson D. Medical decision-making capacity in patients with malignant glioma. Neurology. 2009;73:2086–2092. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c67bce. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan K. Neuropsychological assessment of mental capacity. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2004;14:131–142. doi: 10.1023/B:NERV.0000048180.86543.39. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boele F., Rooney A., Grant R., Klein M. Psychiatric symptoms in glioma patients: From diagnosis to management. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015;10:1413–1420. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S65874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Law Reform Commission . Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws: Issue Paper 44. Commonwealth of Australia; Sydney, Australia: 2013.
    1. Mental Capacity Act 2005. [(accessed on 5 August 2017)]; Available online: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/section/1.

LinkOut - more resources