The Financial Impact of Inaccurate Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems
- PMID: 28946757
- PMCID: PMC5851223
- DOI: 10.1177/1932296817731423
The Financial Impact of Inaccurate Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems
Abstract
Objective: An in silico study of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) patients utilized the UVA-PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator to assess the effect of patient blood glucose monitoring (BGM) system accuracy on clinical outcomes. We applied these findings to assess the financial impact of BGM system inaccuracy.
Methods: The study included 43 BGM systems previously assessed for accuracy according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria. Glycemic responses for the 100 in silico adult T1DM subjects were generated, using each meter. Changes in estimated HbA1c, severe hypoglycemic events, and health care resource utilization were computed for each simulation. The HbA1c Translator modeling approach was used to calculate the financial impact of these changes.
Results: The average cost of inaccuracy associated with the entire group of BGM systems was £155 per patient year (PPY). The average additional cost of BGM systems not meeting the ISO 15197:2003 standard was an estimated £178 PPY more than an average system that fulfills the standard and an estimated £235 PPY more than an average system that appears to meet the ISO 15197:2013 standard.
Conclusion: There is a clear relationship between BGM system accuracy and cost, with the highest costs being associated with BGM systems not meeting the ISO 15197:2003 standard. Lower costs are associated with systems meeting the ISO 15197:2013 system accuracy criteria. Using BGM systems that meet the system accuracy criteria of the ISO 15197:2013 standard can help reduce the clinical and financial consequences associated with inaccuracy of BGM devices.
Keywords: BGM; HbA1c; SMBG; accuracy; clinical impact; cost; diabetes; economic impact; hypoglycemia; in silico; inaccuracy; insulin.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Economic Value of Improved Accuracy for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Devices for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in England.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Sep;12(5):992-1001. doi: 10.1177/1932296818769098. Epub 2018 Apr 21. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 29681171 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):365-80. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700213. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013. PMID: 23566995 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of BGM Accuracy on the Clinical Performance of CGM: An In-Silico Study.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1196-1206. doi: 10.1177/1932296817710476. Epub 2017 May 31. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. PMID: 28560900 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):895-910. doi: 10.1177/1932296815584797. Epub 2015 Jun 8. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 25990294 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Review of Blood Glucose Monitor Accuracy.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Dec;20(12):843-856. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0232. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018. PMID: 30376362 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility study of portable microwave microstrip open-loop resonator for non-invasive blood glucose level sensing: proof of concept.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Nov;57(11):2389-2405. doi: 10.1007/s11517-019-02030-w. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019. PMID: 31473945
-
Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes Care. 2023 Oct 1;46(10):e151-e199. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0036. Diabetes Care. 2023. PMID: 37471273 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modeling of Diabetes and Its Clinical Impact.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Sep;12(5):976-984. doi: 10.1177/1932296818785642. Epub 2018 Jul 13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 30003801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: Modeling, Validation, Refinements, and Utility.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1493-1505. doi: 10.1177/19322968231195081. Epub 2023 Sep 25. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37743740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus.Clin Chem. 2023 Aug 2;69(8):808-868. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad080. Clin Chem. 2023. PMID: 37473453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(suppl 1):S1-S112. - PubMed
-
- Weinstock RS, Xing D, Maahs DM, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(8):3411-3419. - PubMed
-
- Cariou B, Fontaine P, Eschwege E, et al. Frequency and predictors of confirmed hypoglycaemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a real-life setting: results from the DIALOG study. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41(2):116-125. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical