Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Nov;145(15):3096-3105.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268817002060. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

L Hogerwerf et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Psittacosis is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by the transmission of the bacterium Chlamydia psittaci from birds to humans. Infections in humans mainly present as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, most cases of CAP are treated without diagnostic testing, and the importance of C. psittaci infection as a cause of CAP is therefore unclear. In this meta-analysis of published CAP-aetiological studies, we estimate the proportion of CAP caused by C. psittaci infection. The databases MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched for relevant studies published from 1986 onwards. Only studies that consisted of 100 patients or more were included. In total, 57 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. C. psittaci was the causative pathogen in 1·03% (95% CI 0·79-1·30) of all CAP cases from the included studies combined, with a range between studies from 0 to 6·7%. For burden of disease estimates, it is a reasonable assumption that 1% of incident cases of CAP are caused by psittacosis.

Keywords: Chlamydia psittaci; Aetiology; community-acquired pneumonia; psittacosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Selection of publications for the review and meta-analysis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the proportion of CAP caused by Chlamydia psittaci infections, stratified by type of laboratory diagnosis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Proportion of CAP caused by Chlamydia psittaci in different studies over time and by type of laboratory diagnosis (top panel), and contribution of each type of laboratory diagnosis to the total over time (bottom panel). In the top panel, each symbol represents a study and the according percentage of CAP patients in which C. psittaci was found. The varying colours indicate the diagnostic methods that were used. CF, complement fixation test; IF, immunofluorescence test; ‘unsp.’, unspecified; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. In the bottom panel, the filled colours represent the contribution of each type of laboratory diagnosis to the total over time, expressed in percentages. ‘Year of study’ represents the year in which the gathering of data commenced. Although studies published before 1986 were not included, the period in which patient data had been gathered usually differed from the year of publication.

References

    1. Beeckman DSA, Vanrompay DCG. Zoonotic Chlamydophila psittaci infections from a clinical perspective. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2009; 15: 11–17. - PubMed
    1. Halsby KD, et al. Healthy animals, healthy people: zoonosis risk from animal contact in pet shops, a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e89309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heddema ER, et al. An outbreak of psittacosis due to Chlamydophila psittaci genotype A in a veterinary teaching hospital. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2006; 55: 1571–1575. - PubMed
    1. Belchior E, et al. Psittacosis outbreak after participation in a bird fair, Western France, December 2008. Epidemiology and Infection 2011; 139: 1637–1641. - PubMed
    1. Laroucau K, et al. Outbreak of psittacosis in a group of women exposed to Chlamydia psittaci-infected chickens. Eurosurveillance 2015; 20: pii=21155. - PubMed

MeSH terms