Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 25;7(1):12254.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12394-4.

Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats

Affiliations

Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats

Qi Liu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Although antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been used as feed additives, only a few studies have examined their use in ruminants. In this study, we evaluated the use of AMPs(recombinant swine defensin and a fly antibacterial peptide were mixed by 1:1) as a medicated feed additive for juvenile goats. Dietary treatments included control groups (group I: 300 g concentrate; group III: 600 g concentrate), and AMP-supplemented groups (group II: 300 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs; group IV: 600 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs). AMP-treated groups exhibited an increase in bacterial genera, including Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, and Succiniclasticum, and the ciliate genus Ophryoscolex; as well a reduction in bacterial genera, such as Selenomonas, Succinivibrio, and Treponema, and the ciliate genera Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha. The changes in Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, Ophryoscolex, Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha were related to the concentrate. AMP treatment led to increased body weight, average daily weight gain, enzymatic activity (pectinase, xylanase, and lipase), especially in the normal concentrate group, and influence on ruminal fermentation function. In addition, goats treated with AMPs had higher rumen microorganism diversity indices than the control groups. Our results demonstrate that AMPs can be utilized as feed additives for juvenile goats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weight changes in goats per group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang, M. Z., Li-Huai, Y. U., Wang, H. R., Zhang, J. & Zhan-Jun, L. U. Effects of Dietary Structure on Protozoal Profile and Grazing Rate in Rumen of Goats. Chin J Anim Sci. (2009).
    1. Franzolin R, Wright ADG. Microorganisms in the rumen and reticulum of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed two different feeding systems. Bmc Research Notes. 2016;9(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2046-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adg W, Klieve AV. Does the complexity of the rumen microbial ecology preclude methane mitigation. Anim Feed Sci Techn. 2011;s166–167(7):248–253.
    1. Yue ZB, Jin W, Liu XM, Yu HQ. Comparison of rumen microorganism and digester sludge dominated anaerobic digestion processes for aquatic plants. Renew Energ. 2012;46(5):255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.030. - DOI
    1. Madoni P. Estimates of ciliated protozoa biomass in activated sludge and biofilm. Bioresource Technol. 1994;48(3):245–249. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90153-8. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances