Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee
- PMID: 2894883
- PMCID: PMC2545049
Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee
Abstract
A randomised double blind parallel group study was performed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of slow release nifedipine (maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) with those of atenolol (maximum dose 100 mg once a day) as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 410 patients recruited almost exclusively from general practices in 22 centres in the United Kingdom 210 received nifedipine and 200 atenolol. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, and control--a reduction of the diastolic pressure to less than 95 mm Hg--was obtained in about 65% of patients. Those who received nifedipine had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressure than those who received atenolol. One hundred and forty nine patients who failed to respond adequately to either atenolol or nifedipine in low doses were given both drugs once daily for eight weeks in a fixed combination capsule that contained atenolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg. All patients showed further reductions in blood pressure, although those who were taking beta atenolol before the combination capsule had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressures. Twenty six patients (12%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects while taking nifedipine compared with 19 (10%) taking atenolol. Flushing and oedema were more common after the calcium antagonist, whereas diarrhoea and dyspepsia were more common after atenolol. The frequencies of headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnoea were equally distributed between the two groups. When the fixed combination capsule was taken side effects such as flushing and oedema continued. Nifedipine was more effective than atenolol in lowering systolic blood pressure, although neither drug used alone controlled the pressure of more than two thirds of the patients studied. When used in a fixed combination slightly better control of blood pressure was achieved with a lower dose of each drug.
Similar articles
-
Comparative trial of nifedipine retard and atenolol in the treatment of elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Oct;4(5):557-63. J Hum Hypertens. 1990. PMID: 2283646 Clinical Trial.
-
The safety and efficacy of once-daily nifedipine coat-core in combination with atenolol in hypertensive patients. Adalat CC Cooperative Study Group.Clin Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):976-87. Clin Ther. 1993. PMID: 8111817 Clinical Trial.
-
A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of lacidipine with atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. The United Kingdom Lacidipine Study Group.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 4:S27-30. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991. PMID: 1726002 Clinical Trial.
-
[Pharmacology and clinical use of a fixed combination of nifedipine and slow release atenolol (Niften) in the treatment of arterial hypertension and angina pectoris].Minerva Cardioangiol. 1993 Sep;41(9):349-63. Minerva Cardioangiol. 1993. PMID: 7903118 Review. Italian.
-
Calcium antagonists: a review of the recent comparative trials.J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Aug;5(3):S11-5. J Hypertens Suppl. 1987. PMID: 2889810 Review.
Cited by
-
Nifedipine as low-dose monotherapy for essential hypertension: a primary care study.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:341. doi: 10.1007/BF00148480. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989. PMID: 2487805 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Resistant hypertension and the Birmingham Hypertension Square.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001 Jun;3(3):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s11906-001-0039-1. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001. PMID: 11353570 Review.
-
Quality of life in the treatment of hypertension. The effect of calcium antagonists.Drugs. 1992;44 Suppl 1:135-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00026. Drugs. 1992. PMID: 1283577 Review.
-
Nifedipine and/or atenolol for mild to moderate hypertension: a general practice study.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:343. doi: 10.1007/BF00148481. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989. PMID: 2487806 No abstract available.
-
Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):549-60. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12980. Epub 2016 May 31. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27085011 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical