Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2017 Oct 1;6(10):551-553.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.43.

Ethics in HTA: Examining the "Need for Expansion"

Affiliations
Comment

Ethics in HTA: Examining the "Need for Expansion"

Payam Abrishami et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

The article by Daniels and colleagues on expanding the scope of health technology assessment (HTA) to embrace ethical analysis has received endorsement and criticism from commentators in this journal. Referring to this debate, we examine in this article the extent and locus of ethical analysis in HTA processes. An expansion/no-expansion framing of HTA is, in our view, not very fruitful. We argue that meaningfulness and relevance to the needs of the population are what should determine the extent of ethics in HTA. Once 'relevance' is the guiding principle, engaging in ethical analysis becomes inevitable as values are all over the place in HTA, also in how assessors frame research questions. We also challenge dividing the locus of ethical analysis into assessment and appraisal as this would detach HTA from its purpose, ie, supporting legitimate decision-making. Ethical analysis should therefore be considered integral to the HTA process.

Keywords: Ethical Analysis; Health Technology Assessment (HTA); Organizational Decision-Making; Resource Allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Daniels N, Porteny T, Urrutia J. Expanded HTA: enhancing fairness and legitimacy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(1):1–3. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Culyer AJ. HTA - algorithm or process? Comment on “Expanded HTA: enhancing fairness and legitimacy”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(8):501–505. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansen MP, Helderman JK, Boer B, Baltussen R. Fair processes for priority setting: putting theory into practice: Comment on “Expanded HTA: enhancing fairness and legitimacy”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(1):43–47. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.85. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Syrett K. Expanded HTA, legitimacy and independence: Comment on “Expanded HTA: enhancing fairness and legitimacy”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(9):565–567. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.75. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandman L, Gustavsson E. Beyond the black box approach to ethics: Comment on “Expanded HTA: enhancing fairness and legitimacy”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(6):393–394. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.43. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources