Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74.
doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination

Rachel S Purvis  1 , Traci H Abraham  2 , Christopher R Long  3 , M Kathryn Stewart  4 , T Scott Warmack  5 , Pearl Anna McElfish  6
Affiliations

Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination

Rachel S Purvis et al. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level.

Methods: The qualitative study utilized focus-group methodology to explore research participants' experiences and preferences for the dissemination of research findings. Five focus groups were held with 53 participants who were recruited through existing community advisory boards in Arkansas.

Results: Participants stated that researchers should always offer to share research findings. Participants explained that disseminating findings is appropriate because of their sense of ownership of results, it encourages participation facilitating higher quality research, and it may foster greater trust between researchers and participants. Participants also provided insights on how research findings should be shared, including recommendations for appropriate mode, timing, and context, as well as ways to share sensitive findings and the role of community partners in dissemination.

Conclusions: This study is consistent with other studies that document participants' desire to receive research findings and expands our knowledge by documenting participants' rationale for why they think it is important and their recommendations for how to share results. Further research is needed to understand why researchers are not disseminating study findings to participants and to test the best ways to share results.

Keywords: biomedical research; human subjects research; professional ethics; public health; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Baylor A, Muzoora C, Bwana M, et al. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: Challenges and rewards. PLoS Medicine. 2013;10(3):4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownson R, Jacobs J, Tabak R, Hoehner C, Stamatakis K. Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: Findings from a national survey in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(9):1693–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2010;39(4):372–78. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cox K, Moghaddam N, Bird L, Elkan R. Feedback of trial results to participants: A survey of clinicians' and patients' attitudes and experiences. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2011;15(2):124–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Jackson C, Windridge KC, Kenyon S. Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: Qualitative study of participants' views. British Medical Journal. 2006;332(7535):206–10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38675.677963.3A. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources