Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):178-188.
doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1362488. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views

Emily E Anderson  1 , Susan B Newman  2 , Alicia K Matthews  3
Affiliations

Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views

Emily E Anderson et al. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Innovation will be required to improve the informed consent process in research. We aimed to obtain input from key stakeholders-research participants and those responsible for obtaining informed consent-to inform potential development of a multimedia informed consent "app."

Methods: This descriptive study used a mixed-methods approach. Five 90-minute focus groups were conducted with volunteer samples of former research participants and researchers/research staff responsible for obtaining informed consent. Participants also completed a brief survey that measured background information and knowledge and attitudes regarding research and the use of technology. Established qualitative methods were used to conduct the focus groups and data analysis.

Results: We conducted five focus groups with 41 total participants: three groups with former research participants (total n = 22), and two groups with researchers and research coordinators (total n = 19). Overall, individuals who had previously participated in research had positive views regarding their experiences. However, further discussion elicited that the informed consent process often did not meet its intended objectives. Findings from both groups are presented according to three primary themes: content of consent forms, experience of the informed consent process, and the potential of technology to improve the informed consent process. A fourth theme, need for lay input on informed consent, emerged from the researcher groups.

Conclusions: Our findings add to previous research that suggests that the use of interactive technology has the potential to improve the process of informed consent. However, our focus-group findings provide additional insight that technology cannot replace the human connection that is central to the informed consent process. More research that incorporates the views of key stakeholders is needed to ensure that multimedia consent processes do not repeat the mistakes of paper-based consent forms.

Keywords: focus groups; informed consent; stakeholder engagement; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

    1. Agre P, Rapkin B. Improving informed consent: A comparison of four consent tools. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. 2003;25(6):1–7. - PubMed
    1. Brehaut JC, Lott A, Fergusson DA, Shojania KG, Kimmelman J, Saginur R. Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol. Implementation Science. 2008;3:38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brehaut JC, Fergusson DA, Kimmelman J, Shojania KG, Saginur R, Elwyn G. Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2010;31:218–20. - PubMed
    1. Brown RF, Shuk E, Butow P, Edgerson S, Tattersall MHN, Ostroff JS. Identifying patient information needs about cancer clinical trials using a Question Prompt List. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011;84:69–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrne MM, Tannenbaum SL, Gluck S, Hurley J, Antoni M. Participation in cancer clinical trials: Why are patients not participating? Medical Decision Making. 2014;34(1):116–26. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources